Bone biomarkers and overall survival (OS) in men with advanced hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (HSPC): Results from SWOG S1216, a phase III trial of ADT +/- orteronel.

Authors

Primo Lara, Jr

Primo "Lucky" N. Lara Jr.

University of California, Sacramento, CA

Primo "Lucky" N. Lara Jr., Edward Mayerson , Erik Gertz , Catherine Tangen , Amir Goldkorn , Marta Van Loan , Maha H. A. Hussain , Shilpa Gupta , Jingsong Zhang , Mamta Parikh , Przemyslaw Twardowski , David I. Quinn , Nicholas J. Vogelzang , Ian M Thompson Jr., Neeraj Agarwal

Organizations

University of California, Sacramento, CA, SWOG Statistical Center, Seattle, WA, USDA, WHNRC, Davis, CA, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, Keck School of Medicine and Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USDA, Davis, CA, Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, FL, UC Davis Comprehensive Cancer Center, Sacramento, CA, City of Hope, Duarte, CA, USC Norris Cancer Hospital, Los Angeles, CA, Comprehensive Cancer Centers, Las Vegas, NV, Children's Hospital of San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT

Research Funding

U.S. National Institutes of Health
Other Foundation, Pharmaceutical/Biotech Company

Background: Circulating bone biomarkers (BB) are strongly prognostic for OS in castration-resistant PC (CRPC). We prospectively evaluated BB in men with HSPC in S1216, a trial that established new OS benchmarks. We sought to identify patient (pt) subsets with differential OS outcomes as defined by BB. Methods: Markers of bone resorption [CTx;PYD] & formation [CICP;BAP] were assessed. Pts were randomly divided into training (1/3) & validation (2/3) sets. In the training set, recursive partitioning of OS was used to identify the ideal dichotomous cutpoint for each BB & for a combination of biomarker split points to define prognostic groups. In the validation set, Cox PH models were used to assess impact of BB on OS, adjusted for pt & tumor characteristics. Adjusted odds ratios for 3-year OS based on BB & baseline clinical factors were developed using logistic regression to estimate receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. Results: Of 1,279 men, 949 had baseline BB. Median age–68y; median PSA-28 ng/dL; Gleason>7: 60%; Zubrod PS 0/1-97%. Values of BB at the median & at cutpoints maximized for OS were identified. For 3 of the BB, the cutpoint was at the ̃85th %ile; for PYD it was at the median. Recursive partitioning algorithms applied to the training set identified 4 groups with differential OS based on a dichotomous split of CTx in combination with additional CICP splits within each group. Hazard ratios (HR) for OS based on elevated BBs are shown. ROC analysis showed that only BAP & PYD had significantly higher AUC(0.73;0.74) compared to AUC of baseline clinical factors(0.71) w/ p=0.02 and 0.03 respectively. There was no evidence of BB x treatment interaction (all p>=0.2). Conclusions: In men initiating ADT for HSPC, elevated BB are strongly prognostic for worse OS. BB levels alone & in combination with pt/tumor characteristics identify unique subsets of men with high probability of being alive at 3 years from ADT initiation. These results validate the clinical value of BB in the HSPC state, extending BB utility beyond CRPC. Clinical trial information: NCT01809691.

Bone biomarkers (BB) and OS in validation set (N=633).

Median OS, yearsHR forElevated Markers*(95%CI)
p-value*^AUC**
BB

Bone Alkaline Phosphatase (BAP; U/L)
Hi: 3.3

Lo: 6.8
1.43 (1.02;2.01)0.040.732
C-terminal collagen propeptide (CICP; ng/mL)Hi: 2.4

Lo: 7.6
1.93 (1.40;2.64)<0.00010.723
C-Telopeptide (CTx; ng/mL)Hi: 4.0

Lo: 7.7
1.37 (1.07;1.77)0.010.723
Pyridinoline (PYD; nmol/L)Hi: 3.4

Lo: 8.2
1.78 (1.40;2.27)<0.00010.742
BB Combination0.00130.726
CTx <0.6 & CICP <1618.21.00 (reference)
CTx <0.6 & CICP >=1615.11.55 (1.06;2.28)
CTx >=0.6 & CICP <2865.01.39 (1.04;1.85)
CTx >=0.6 & CICP >2862.12.12 (1.43;3.16)

*Adjusted for treatment arm, disease extent, Zubrod PS, PSA, Gleason Score, age, Afr-Amer (Y/N), and visceral mets status; ^p-values from Wald Chi-Square test for Type 3 analysis of effects; ** from logistic model.

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2022 ASCO Annual Meeting

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Genitourinary Cancer—Prostate, Testicular, and Penile

Track

Genitourinary Cancer—Prostate, Testicular, and Penile

Sub Track

Prostate Cancer– Advanced/Hormone-Sensitive

Clinical Trial Registration Number

NCT01809691

Citation

J Clin Oncol 40, 2022 (suppl 16; abstr 5071)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2022.40.16_suppl.5071

Abstract #

5071

Poster Bd #

254

Abstract Disclosures