TIVO-3: Final OS analysis of a phase III, randomized, controlled, multicenter, open-label study to compare tivozanib to sorafenib in subjects with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC).

Authors

Sumanta Pal

Sumanta K. Pal

City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, CA

Sumanta K. Pal , Bernard Escudier , Michael B. Atkins , Thomas E. Hutson , Camillo Porta , Elena Verzoni , Michael N. Needle , David F. McDermott , Brian I. Rini

Organizations

City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, CA, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France, Georgetown Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Washington, DC, Baylor Sammons Cancer Center-Texas Oncology, Dallas, TX, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Pavia and Division of Traslational Oncology, IRCCS Istituti Clinici Scientifici Maugeri, Pavia, Italy, Medical Oncology Department, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori di Milano, Milan, Italy, Aveo Oncology, Cambridge, MA, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Dana-Farber/Harvard Cancer Center, Boston, MA, Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland, OH

Research Funding

Pharmaceutical/Biotech Company
AVEO Oncology

Background: Tivozanib (T) is a potent and highly selective VEGFR inhibitor. TIVO-3 is a phase 3 study designed to compare the efficacy and safety of T with those of sorafenib (S) as 3rd and 4th line therapy in patients with metastatic RCC. Methods: Subjects with RCC who failed 2 or 3 prior systemic regimens, one of which included a VEGFR TKI other than S or T, were stratified by IMDC risk category and type of prior therapy (two TKIs; TKI plus checkpoint inhibitor (CPI); TKI plus other) then randomized in a 1:1 ratio to T or S. Results: The 2 arms were well balanced for demographics and prior cancer history. 60% of subjects had 2 prior lines of therapy and 40% had 3 prior lines. 26% had prior treatment with a CPI. Patients treated with T demonstrated PFS superiority compared to S, 5.6 (95% CI 7.3 - 5.3) v. 3.9 mos (95% CI 5.6 – 3.7; HR 0.73; p=0.02). ORR was 18% for T compared to 8% for S (p=0.02). 44% of T treated subjects experienced a grade 3 treatment-related adverse event compared to 55% for S. The predefined, interim analysis for OS performed two years after enrollment was closed had a HR of 0.99 based on 227 events. The final analysis will be presented based on an estimate of 263 events. Conclusions: T is superior to S as measured by PFS; 2-year PFS, and ORR in this heavily-treated/relapsed or refractory RCC population and is better tolerated than S. Final OS data will be updated prior to presentation. Clinical trial information: 02627963.

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2020 ASCO Virtual Scientific Program

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Genitourinary Cancer—Kidney and Bladder

Track

Genitourinary Cancer—Kidney and Bladder

Sub Track

Kidney Cancer

Clinical Trial Registration Number

02627963

Citation

J Clin Oncol 38: 2020 (suppl; abstr 5062)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2020.38.15_suppl.5062

Abstract #

5062

Poster Bd #

131

Abstract Disclosures

Similar Abstracts

First Author: Jeffrey Thomas Yorio

First Author: Elena Verzoni

First Author: Jonathan Heseltine

First Author: Florence Marteau