TIVO-3: Durability of response and updated overall survival of tivozanib versus sorafenib in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC).

Authors

null

Elena Verzoni

Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Milan, Italy

Elena Verzoni , Bernard Escudier , Thomas E. Hutson , David F. McDermott , Sumanta K. Pal , Camillo Porta , Brian I. Rini , Michael N. Needle , Michael B. Atkins

Organizations

Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Milan, Italy, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France, Texas A&M College of Medicine, Bryan, TX, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Dana-Farber/Harvard Cancer Center, Boston, MA, Department of Medical Oncology & Therapeutics, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, CA, University of Bari 'A. Moro' and Policlinico Consorziale di Bari, Bari, Italy, Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Nashville, TN, Aveo Oncology, Boston, MA, Georgetown Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Washington, DC

Research Funding

Pharmaceutical/Biotech Company
AVEO Oncology

Background: Tivozanib is a potent and highly selective VEGF receptor (R) tyrosine kinase inhibitor in clinical development for mRCC. Methods: The TIVO-3 study enrolled subjects with mRCC who failed 2 or 3 prior systemic regimens, one of which included a VEGFR TKI, stratified by IMDC risk category and type of prior therapy (two TKIs; TKI plus checkpoint; TKI + other) then randomized 1:1 to T or sorafenib. Tivozanib demonstrated PFS and ORR advantages over sorafenib. Here we report long term durability of response based on investigator assessment and updated overall survival. Results: There were 41 responders (23%) to tivozanib and 20 responders (11%) to sorafenib. The median duration of response (mDoR) was 20.3 months (95% CI: 9.8, 29.9) and 9.0 months (95% CI: 3.7, 16.6) for tivozanib and sorafenib, respectively. With prolonged follow up there were 270 deaths; the HR for overall survival favored tivozanib at 0.91 (95% CI: 0.716, 1.165). Clinical trial information: NCT02627963. Conclusions: Tivozanib treatment in third and fourth line mRCC results in longer PFS, higher objective response rate and more durable responses compared to sorafenib. There is no difference in overall survival.

Treatment
N
Objective Response
Ongoing Response
mDoR in Months (95% CI)
HR (95% CI)
Sorafenib
175
20 (11%)
3
9.0 (3.7, 16.6)
0.55

(0.30, 1.00)
Tivozanib
175
41 (23%)
13
20.3 (9.8, 29.9)

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2021 ASCO Annual Meeting

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Genitourinary Cancer—Kidney and Bladder

Track

Genitourinary Cancer—Kidney and Bladder

Sub Track

Kidney Cancer

Clinical Trial Registration Number

NCT02627963

Citation

J Clin Oncol 39, 2021 (suppl 15; abstr 4546)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2021.39.15_suppl.4546

Abstract #

4546

Poster Bd #

Online Only

Abstract Disclosures