Real-world outcomes for metastatic non-small cell lung cancer patients treated with checkpoint inhibitor immunotherapy in Canada.

Authors

Dimas Yusuf

Dimas Yusuf

Cross Cancer Institute, Edmonton, AB, Canada

Dimas Yusuf, Jenny J. Ko, Hyokeun Cho, Corey Sheremeto, Ying Wang, Rosalyn A. Juergens, Peter Michael Ellis, Alkarim Billawala, Amin Kay, Swati Kulkarni, Tarek A. Elfiki, Rasna Gupta, Krista Naccarato, Alex Pennetti, Devalben Patel, Elliot Charles Smith, Ryan Walton, Manjusha Hurry, Geoffrey Liu, Winson Y. Cheung

Organizations

Cross Cancer Institute, Edmonton, AB, Canada, Tom Baker Cancer Centre, Calgary, AB, Canada, BC Cancer Agency, Vancouver, BC, Canada, BC Cancer Vancouver, Vancouver, BC, Canada, Juravinski Cancer Centre, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada, Juravinski Cancer Centre, Hamilton, ON, Canada, Tom Baker Cancer Center, Calgary, AB, Canada, Windsor Regional Cancer Centre, Windsor, ON, Canada, University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, IL, Windsor Regional Caner Center, Lakeshore, ON, Canada, Barbara Ann Karmanos Cancer Inst, Detroit, MI, Canada, Windsor Regional Hospital, Windsor, ON, Canada, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Ontario Cancer Institute, Toronto, ON, Canada, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada, AstraZeneca Canada, Mississauga, Ontario, ON, Canada, AstraZeneca Canada, Mississauga, ON, Canada

Research Funding

Pharmaceutical/Biotech Company
AstraZeneca.

Background: The majority of patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) are diagnosed with incurable, metastatic disease. Immunotherapy (IO) agents have improved overall, long term survival. There is a need to better understand how these drugs are utilized and perform in the real world to further inform physicians and policymakers. Methods: In this retrospective study, we analyzed characteristics, treatment patterns, and outcomes of patients with metastatic NSCLC treated with checkpoint inhibitors nivolumab or pembrolizumab at five Canadian cancer centres, with a focus on patients who received these treatments in the 2nd (2L) or 3rd line (3L) setting. We excluded patients who were in blinded clinical trials, exposed to multiple IO drugs, or who had tumors with EGFR or ALK mutations. Primary endpoints were overall survival (OS) and progression free survival (PFS) from start of IO. Secondary endpoints included immune-related toxicities. Results: Across all sites, we screened 322 patients and included 230 who met criteria: 49 (21%) from Alberta; 60 (26%) from British Columbia; and 121 (53%) from Ontario. Patients were diagnosed with metastatic NSCLC from 2009 to 2018, but the majority were diagnosed after 2015. Median age at diagnosis was 66.6 years, 54% were female, and 86% were either current or former smokers and 67% had stage IV disease. About 88% received nivolumab; 87% (n=200) received IO in 2L (n=111) or 3L (n=89). The median OS from start of IO was 10.9 (8.7–15.6) months, and were similar for 2L vs 3L (9.3 vs 12.0 months, p = 0.2). Median PFS was 5.7 (4.4–8.1) months. Pneumonitis was the most frequently reported toxicity affecting 7% of patients. Thyroiditis was reported in 4%; colitis, while dermatitis and hepatitis were each reported in 3%, and nephritis in 1%. Conclusions: In the real world, IO for advanced NSCLC was well-tolerated and had outcomes that were comparable to landmark clinical trials.

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2020 ASCO-SITC Clinical Immuno-Oncology Symposium

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Poster Session B

Track

Breast and Gynecologic Cancers,Developmental Therapeutics,Genitourinary Cancer,Head and Neck Cancer,Lung Cancer,Melanoma/Skin Cancers,Gastrointestinal Cancer,Combination Studies,Implications for Patients and Society,Miscellaneous Cancers,Hematologic Malignancies

Sub Track

Immune Checkpoints and Stimulatory Receptors

Citation

J Clin Oncol 38, 2020 (suppl 5; abstr 54)

Abstract #

54

Poster Bd #

C3

Abstract Disclosures