Impact of palliative care in patients with metastatic esophageal cancer declining chemotherapy.

Authors

null

Nicholas Manguso

Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Department of Surgery, Los Angeles, CA

Nicholas Manguso , Sungjin Kim , Michelle Guan , Veronica Placencio-Hickok , Haesoo Kim , Jar-Yee Liu , Andrew Eugene Hendifar , Samuel J. Klempner , Miguel Burch , Alexandra Gangi , Joseph Chao , Mitchell Kamrava , Katelyn Mae Atkins , Jun Gong

Organizations

Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Department of Surgery, Los Angeles, CA, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, Samuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, West Hollywood, CA, The Angeles Clinic and Research Institute, Los Angeles, CA, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, CA, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, LA, CA, City of Hope, Duarte, CA

Research Funding

No funding received
None

Background: Palliative care has been associated with improved overall survival (OS), but limited data exist in metastatic esophageal cancer (mEC). We investigated the impact of palliative care in patients with mEC who declined chemotherapy (CTX). Methods: The National Cancer Database was used to identify patients between 2004-2015. Patients with M1 disease who declined CTX and had known palliative care status (surgery, radiotherapy [RT], pain management, or any combination of) were included. Cases with unknown CTX, RT, or nonprimary surgery status were excluded. Kaplan-Meier estimates of OS were calculated. Univariable and multivariable Cox regressions were performed. Results: Among 140,234 EC cases, we identified 1,493 patients who declined CTX and had complete data. Median age was 70 years, most (66.3%) had a Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) of 0, and 37.1% were treated at an academic center. Most (72.7%) did not receive palliative care. Median OS was 2.53 months (mos), with no statistically significant difference in median OS between those receiving palliative care (2.83 mos, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.53-3.12) vs. no palliative care (2.37 mos, 2.2-2.56; p = 0.288). On univariable analysis, treatment at an academic center (hazard ratio [HR] 0.90, 0.80-1.00) and CCI ≥2 (HR 1.20, 1.00-1.42) were predictive of OS (p < 0.05). On multivariable analysis, male sex (HR 1.23, 1.08-1.40), South geographic region (HR 1.23, 1.04-1.46), CCI of 1 (HR 1.17, 1.03-1.32), higher grade (HR 1.21, 1.07-1.38), and higher T stage (HR 1.39, 1.12-1.73) were associated with poor OS (p < 0.05). Conclusions: Palliative care conferred a numerically higher, but not statistically significant difference in OS among patients with mEC declining CTX. Quality of life metrics, inpatient status, and subgroup analyses are important for examining the role of palliative care in mEC and future studies are warranted.

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2020 Gastrointestinal Cancers Symposium

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Poster Session A: Esophageal and Gastric Cancer and Other GI Cancers

Track

Esophageal and Gastric Cancer,Other GI Cancer

Sub Track

Patient-Reported Outcomes and Real-World Evidence

Citation

J Clin Oncol 38, 2020 (suppl 4; abstr 315)

Abstract #

315

Poster Bd #

B12

Abstract Disclosures