Pegilodecakin as monotherapy or in combination with anti-PD-1 or tyrosine kinase inhibitor in heavily pretreated patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC): Updated results from phase I/Ib IVY study.

Authors

null

Aung Naing

University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX

Aung Naing , Kyriakos P. Papadopoulos , Deborah J.L. Wong , Raid Aljumaily , Annie Hung , Manuel Afable , Jong Seok Kim , David Ferry , Alexandra Drakaki , Johanna C. Bendell , Nizar M. Tannir

Organizations

University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, South Texas Accelerated Research Therapeutics (START), San Antonio, TX, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, Stephenson Cancer Center, University of Oklahoma HSC; Sarah Cannon Research Institute, Nashville, TN, Armo BioSciences, Redwood City, CA, Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, Eli Lilly and Company, Bridgewater, NJ, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, Sarah Cannon Research Institute/Tennessee Oncology, Nashville, TN

Research Funding

Pharmaceutical/Biotech Company
ARMO BioSciences, a wholly owned subsidiary of Eli Lilly and Company

Background: Pegilodecakin (PEG), a pegylated recombinant human interleukin-10, has demonstrated clinical benefit and manageable toxicity in advanced RCC (Naing et al. 2016 JCO, Naing et al. 2019 Lancet Oncol). As part of the multi-arm (arm A to J) phase 1 IVY study, PEG alone (Part A) or in combination with pazopanib (Part G) or anti-PD-1 (pembrolizumab or nivolumab; Parts H+I) were investigated in heavily pretreated RCC patients (pts). Methods: In a phase 1/1b study which enrolled 353 pts in the US from 2013 to 2017, we analyzed treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) graded by CTCAE v 4.02, tumor response by irRC, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) for all the advanced RCC pts who received PEG-containing treatment (n=66). Data cut-off was February 19, 2019. Results: Sixty six heavily pretreated RCC pts received PEG alone (n=24, 1-20 µg/kg), with pazopanib (n=4, 10µg/kg), with pembrolizumab (n=9, 10-20 µg/kg), or with nivolumab (n=29, 10-20 µg/kg). Most pts were male (70%), median age 62.5 years, initially diagnosed as stage IV (42%) with clear cell histology (64%), ECOG performance status of 1 (58%), and intermediate/poor (73%/14%) risk per IMDC category. Patients received a median number of 2 prior therapies. Most common grade 3/4 TRAEs were anemia (32%), thrombocytopenia (15%), and hypertriglyceridemia (14%). No pts died due to a TRAE. Median follow-up was 31.5 months. Conclusions: PEG alone or in combination with anti-PD-1 or pazopanib suggested some clinical activity with manageable toxicity in advanced RCC pts. These findings support further ongoing studies of PEG combinations in RCC pts. Clinical trial information: NCT02009449.

A
PEG monotherapy
G
Pazopanib
H+I
Pembrolizumab (H), Nivolumab (I)
Safety(N=24)(N=4)(N=38)
G 3/4 TRAE, n(%)14 (58)4 (100)26 (68)
1yr OS rate (%)505083
2yr OS rate (%)175071
mPFS (months)1.83.713.9
mOS (months)10.9NRNR
Evaluable(N=20)(N=3)(N=35)
ORR, %203343
mDOR (months)19.77.4NR

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2020 Genitourinary Cancers Symposium

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Poster Session C: Renal Cell Cancer

Track

Renal Cell Cancer

Sub Track

Therapeutics

Clinical Trial Registration Number

NCT02009449

Citation

J Clin Oncol 38, 2020 (suppl 6; abstr 679)

Abstract #

679

Poster Bd #

F21

Abstract Disclosures

Similar Abstracts