Pathways impact on OCM drug cost.

Authors

Valerie Csik

Valerie Pracilio Csik

Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA

Valerie Pracilio Csik, Jared Minetola, Karen Walsh, Michael J. Ramirez, Mark Hurwitz

Organizations

Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, Department of Medical Oncology, Kimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA

Research Funding

No funding received
None.

Background: Oncology care, including drugs, represents a significant portion of US healthcare spending. Cost of Part B drugs has increased at a rate 5.7x that of overall Medicare spending (1997-2004). As a participant in the Oncology Care Model (OCM), we found drug costs represent a majority of our total costs. To reduce treatment (Tx) variability, our NCI-designated cancer center chose to implement pathways. Pathways are a clinical decision-support tool that use evidence-based care maps accounting for efficacy, toxicity and cost. At one institution, use of pathways contributed to $15k in savings for stage IV lung cancer Tx. We hypothesized pathway driven Tx standardization would favorably impact total chemotherapy (CTx) costs at the implementation site. Methods: In July 2018, we implemented pathways in Medical and Radiation Oncology for new starts or changes in Tx. Oncologists accessed the tool through our EMR, selected and placed orders for Tx. OCM quarterly data was used to compare 2 quarters immediately pre- and post-pathway implementation. The cancer-mix-adjusted Per-Member-Per-Month (PMPM) Allowed Amounts for CTx were compared between 3 groups; patients on-pathway, patients off-pathway and patients for which the pathways tool was not used (no utilization). PMPMs were evaluated pre- and post-implementation and an ANOVA test was used to evaluate significance of the difference between the two periods. Results: PMPM CTx costs decreased 4.6% between pre- and post-pathway implementation when oncologists followed pathways. By comparison, the off-pathway cohort and the no utilization groups had increases of 0.9% and 17.7% respectively. An evaluation of cost difference proved significant (p < .0001). Breast patients on-pathway had a cost decrease of 20%, compared to increases of 32% and 11% for off-pathway and no utilization groups, respectively. Conclusions: Pathway use reduced variation, a known contributor to healthcare costs, and therefore may be an effective cost control tool. Additional quarters of claims data is needed post-implementation to fully define the impact of pathways on total cost.

On-Pathway Off-Pathway No Utilization
Patients 128 60 1700
Pre-Implementation $ 5,917 6,854 5,026
Post-Implementation $ 5,647 6,917 5,918
Pre-Post Trend -4.6% 0.9% 17.7%

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2019 ASCO Quality Care Symposium

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Poster Session A: Cost, Value, and Policy; Health Equity and Disparities

Track

Cost, Value, and Policy,Health Care Access, Equity, and Disparities

Sub Track

Value/Cost of Care

Citation

J Clin Oncol 37, 2019 (suppl 27; abstr 109)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2019.37.27_suppl.109

Abstract #

109

Poster Bd #

H8

Abstract Disclosures

Similar Abstracts