The Oncology Care Model and lung cancer: Retrospective review of claims and clinical data at a large academic medical center.

Authors

Chetan Vakkalagadda

Chetan Vakkalagadda

Northwestern University School of Medicine, Chicago, IL

Chetan Vakkalagadda, Bijal Desai, Nisha Anjali Mohindra, Sheetal Mehta Kircher

Organizations

Northwestern University School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, Northwestern Medicine, Chicago, IL, Department of Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center of Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center of Northwestern University, Chicago, IL

Research Funding

No funding received
None

Background: The Oncology Care Model (OCM) is a Center for Medicare and Medicaid Innovation (CMMI) alternative payment model designed to enhance value in cancer care. Based on a practice’s historical performance, the model predicts a target price for a 6-month episode of care and adjusts for factors such as age, modality received, geographic location, trend factor, and receipt of a novel therapy. Practices are incentivized to reduce costs of care, allowing for a performance based payment if the total cost of care is below the predicted OCM target price. At our OCM practice, when compared to other malignancy types, lung cancer has disproportionately failed to meet the OCM target. The purpose of our review was to explore the contribution of systemic therapy to total cost within the OCM model for lung cancer episodes. Methods: We reviewed claims and clinical data for the OCM Performance Period 6 (PP6), which corresponds to episodes beginning between 1/2/19-7/1/19 and ending between 7/2/19-12/31/19, for all OCM lung cancer episodes at Northwestern Medical Group. Results: 142 patients were identified with non-small cell (n = 128, 91%) and small cell lung cancer (n = 14, 9%). Patients received a PD1 inhibitor either alone or in combination with chemotherapy (n = 87), tyrosine kinase inhibitors (n = 18), both a PD1 inhibitor and a TKI (n = 2), or chemotherapy alone (n = 35). All systemic therapy use was deemed guideline compliant. 46 patients (33%) had at least 1 cancer-related hospital admission during the episode. 19 patients (13.4%) died during the OCM performance period. 39/142 (27.5%) of patients’ episode costs achieved the OCM target. Among the 103 patients whose total costs exceeded the target, drug costs alone exceeded the target in 67 (65%). Drug costs alone exceeded the total target in 59% (n = 63/107) of those who received PD1 inhibitor or TKI therapy and 11.4% (4/35) of those who received chemotherapy alone. 94% (n = 63/67) of patients for whom drug costs alone exceeded the OCM target received anti-PD1 therapy or a TKI. Conclusions: Drug cost alone exceeded the total target in the majority of OCM lung cancer episodes that did not achieve savings, highlighting the dominant role drugs play in the OCM model. With targeted therapy and immunotherapy already the standard of care in metastatic non-small cell lung cancer, and gaining a foothold in earlier stages of disease, accounting for these therapies in the OCM target price methodology will be critical for oncology practices to be successful within such value-based payment models.

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2021 ASCO Quality Care Symposium

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Poster Session A: Cost, Value, and Policy; Health Equity and Disparities; Patient Experience

Track

Cost, Value, and Policy,Technology and Innovation in Quality of Care,Health Care Access, Equity, and Disparities,Patient Experience,Quality, Safety, and Implementation Science

Sub Track

Value/Cost of Care

Citation

J Clin Oncol 39, 2021 (suppl 28; abstr 62)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2020.39.28_suppl.62

Abstract #

62

Poster Bd #

Online Only

Abstract Disclosures