Randomized phase II CLIO study on olaparib monotherapy versus chemotherapy in platinum-resistant ovarian cancer.

Authors

null

Adriaan Vanderstichele

BGOG & Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven Cancer Institute, Leuven, Belgium

Adriaan Vanderstichele , Els Van Nieuwenhuysen , Sileny Han , Nicole Concin , Toon Van Gorp , Patrick Berteloot , Patrick Neven , Pieter Busschaert , Diether Lambrechts , Ignace Vergote

Organizations

BGOG & Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven Cancer Institute, Leuven, Belgium, Laboratoraty of Translational Genetics , VIB Center for Cancer Biology, Leuven Cancer Institute, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium, BGOG and University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven Cancer Institute, Leuven, Belgium

Research Funding

Other
Pharmaceutical/Biotech Company

Background: The CLIO trial (NCT02822157) evaluated olaparib single-agent therapy versus standard of care chemotherapy in platinum-resistant (recurrence within 6 months after last platin) ovarian cancer (PROC). Methods: Eligible patients with measurable disease and ≥1 prior line of chemotherapy were randomized 2:1 to Olaparib (OLA) monotherapy (300 mg tablets, BID) or physician’s choice chemotherapy (CT; PLD 40 mg/m2 q 4 wks; Topotecan 1.25 mg/m2 day 1—5 q 3 wks; Paclitaxel 80 mg/m2 day 1, 8,15 q 3 wks; Gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 day 1, 8 and 15 q 4 wks). Primary endpoint was objective overall response (ORR) per RECIST v1.1. Germline BRCA status was available for all patients. Disease control rate (DCR) was defined as response for at least 12 wks. Results: 100 patients with PROC were randomized 2:1 to OLA (N = 67) or CT (N = 33). Median prior lines of treatment was 3 (range: 1—8). ORR (unconfirmed) was 18% (12/67) for OLA and 6% (2/33) for CT. ORR for OLA was 38% (5/13) in gBRCAm and 13% (7/54) in gBRCAwt patients. Of note, 2 patients with gBRIP1 mutation had no response under OLA. DCR was 35.8% (24/67) for OLA and 42% (14/33) for CT. DCR under OLA in gBRCAm was 62% (8/13) compared to 30% (16/54) in gBRCAwt disease. The median duration of response (DOR) and the median progression-free survival (PFS) was similar: 5.4 months vs 4.5 months (DOR) and 2.9 vs 3.4 months (PFS) for OLA and CT, respectively. Grade ≥3 treatment-related AEs occurred in 60% vs 52% for OLA and CT, respectively. Somatic HRR mutation analysis is ongoing and will be presented. Conclusions: Olaparib monotherapy showed a favorable response rate in PROC compared with chemotherapy also in gBRCAwt patients. Analysis of clinical endpoints in relation to HRR is ongoing and will be presented. Clinical trial information: NCT02822157

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2019 ASCO Annual Meeting

Session Type

Oral Abstract Session

Session Title

Gynecologic Cancer

Track

Gynecologic Cancer

Sub Track

Ovarian Cancer

Clinical Trial Registration Number

NCT02822157

Citation

J Clin Oncol 37, 2019 (suppl; abstr 5507)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2019.37.15_suppl.5507

Abstract #

5507

Abstract Disclosures