Pembrolizumab (pembro) with paclitaxel (taxol) or capecitabine (cape) as early treatment of metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (mTNBC).

Authors

null

David B. Page

Earle A. Chiles Research Institute at the Robert W. Franz Cancer Center, Portland, OR

David B. Page , Brie Chun , Joanna Pucilowska , Isaac Kim , Katherine Sanchez , William L Redmond , Zhaoyu Sun , Yaping Wu , Alicia Feryn , Maritza Martel , Christina DiLauro Abaya , Dottie Wadell , Staci L. Mellinger , Nicole Moxon , Walter John Urba , Philomena McAndrew , Maryliza El-Masry , Reva K. Basho , Alison Katherine Conlin , Heather L. McArthur

Organizations

Earle A. Chiles Research Institute at the Robert W. Franz Cancer Center, Portland, OR, Oregon Health and Sciences University, Portland, OR, David Geffen School of Medicine at University of California, Los Angeles, CA, Patient Advocate, Portland, OR, Providence Cancer Center, Portland, OR, Twr Hem Onc Medcl Grp, Beverly Hills, CA, Stanford, Palo Alto, CA, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Houston, TX, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA

Research Funding

Pharmaceutical/Biotech Company

Background: Atezolizumab (anti-PD-L1) plus nab-paclitaxel was shown to improve outcomes in mTBNC in a phase III clinical trial. Subjects were required to be > 12 months from curative-intent therapy in this trial. It remains unknown whether non-taxane chemo + anti-PD-1/L1 will be beneficial in mTNBC, or whether this approach is effective in rapidly-progressing patients ( < 12 mo from curative-intent therapy). Methods: mTNBC patients were enrolled in a phase Ib study of anti-PD-1 (pembro, 200mg IV q3w) plus physician’s choice chemo (cape: n = 14, 2000mg BID, 7d on/7d off; or taxol: n = 14, 80mg/m2 q1w). Primary/secondary objectives were to evaluate safety/tolerability (primary) and RECIST1.1 response (w12). The exploratory objective was to explore for differences in immunomodulation according to chemo choice. Mixed effects models were employed to compare the longitudinal effects of chemo on peripheral immune cells (flow cytometry) and T-cell diversity (Immunoseq assay). Results: Enrollment of the trial is complete (n = 28), with 100% of evaluable patients tolerating therapy (n = 22) as of 2/1/2019. Cape ORR was 43% (5 PR, 1 CR, 2 SD) with median PFS = 155d. Taxol ORR was 25% (1 CR, 1 PR, 3 SD) with median PFS = 99d. Subjects enrolled < 12 months from curative-intent therapy had numerically lower response (ORR = 27%, 1 CR, 2 PR, 3 SD) than subjects without rapid progression (ORR = 45%, 1 CR, 4 PR, 2 SD). No significant differences in immunomodulation were observed according to chemo type, however both cape & taxol were associated with declines in T-cell quantity (CD4 p < .02, CD8 p < .04) and Immunoseq T-cell fraction over time. Conclusions: Pembro plus cape or taxol is safe with encouraging efficacy, however activity may be lower in the setting of rapid progression following curative-intent chemo. Cape+pembro efficacy is favorable with no measurable differences in immunomodulation, and therefore cape may be preferred as a chemo backbone in selected patients. Both cape and taxol are associated with iatrogenic declines in T-cell quantity, which may explain the observed dropoff in anti-PD-1/L1 activity in later lines. Clinical trial information: NCT02734290

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2019 ASCO Annual Meeting

Session Type

Poster Discussion Session

Session Title

Breast Cancer—Metastatic

Track

Breast Cancer

Sub Track

Triple-Negative

Clinical Trial Registration Number

NCT02734290

Citation

J Clin Oncol 37, 2019 (suppl; abstr 1015)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2019.37.15_suppl.1015

Abstract #

1015

Poster Bd #

96

Abstract Disclosures