Association of tumor mutational burden (TMB) and clinical outcomes with pembrolizumab (pembro) versus chemotherapy (chemo) in patients with metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (mTNBC) from KEYNOTE-119.

Authors

Eric Winer

Eric P. Winer

Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA

Eric P. Winer , Oleg Lipatov , Seock-Ah Im , Anthony Goncalves , Eva Muñoz-Couselo , Keun Seok Lee , Peter Schmid , Laura Testa , Isabell Witzel , Shoichiro Ohtani , Jared Lunceford , Vassiliki Karantza , Jaime Alberto Mejia , Razvan Cristescu , Deepti Aurora-Garg , Petar Jelinic , Lingkang Huang , Javier Cortes

Organizations

Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, Republican Clinical Oncology Dispensary of the Ministry of Public Health of Bashkortostan Republic, Ufa, Russian Federation, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, and Cancer Research Institute, Seoul, South Korea, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Marseille, France, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain, Center for Breast Cancer, Research Institute and Hospital, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Gyeonggi, South Korea, Barts ECMC, Barts Cancer Institute, Queen Mary University of London, and Barts Hospital NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom, Instituto do Câncer do Estado de São Paulo, Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany, Hiroshima City Hiroshima Citizens Hospital, Hiroshima, Japan, Merck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, NJ, IOB Institute of Oncology, Hospital Quirónsalud, Medica Scientia Innovation Research, and Vall d’Hebron University of Oncology, Barcelona, Spain

Research Funding

Pharmaceutical/Biotech Company
Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., a subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, NJ, USA

Background: In the randomized, open-label, phase 3 KEYNOTE-119 study (NCT02555657), OS was not significantly different with pembro monotherapy versus chemo in second- or third-line settings for mTNBC; however, the pembro treatment effect increased with increasing PD-L1 enrichment. We evaluated the association of TMB with efficacy of pembro monotherapy versus chemo in patients with previously treated mTNBC. Methods: Patients with centrally confirmed TNBC and 1 or 2 prior systemic treatments for metastatic disease were enrolled. Patients were randomly assigned 1:1 to pembro 200 mg Q3W or single-agent chemo per investigator’s choice of capecitabine, eribulin, gemcitabine, or vinorelbine. Association of TMB, as measured by FoundationOne CDx (Foundation Medicine), with response was an exploratory objective evaluated using receiver operator characteristic (ROC) analysis, logistic regression (ORR), and Cox regression (OS; PFS) within treatment arms; estimates of efficacy based on TMB cutpoint used a prespecified cutpoint of 10 mut/Mb. Results: TMB data were available for 253/601 (42.1%) treated patients (pembro, n = 132; chemo, n = 121); baseline characteristics were similar to that of the overall study population. One-sided P values for the association of TMB and clinical outcomes in pembro-treated patients were 0.154 for ORR, 0.014 for PFS, and 0.018 for OS; the area under the ROC curve ([AUROC] 95% CI) for predicting ORR was 0.58 (0.43-0.73). Two-sided P values for the association of TMB and clinical outcomes in chemo-treated patients were 0.114 for ORR, 0.478 for PFS, and 0.906 for OS; AUROC (95% CI) was 0.43 (0.27-0.59). Twenty-six patients had TMB ≥10 mut/Mb. Thus, the prevalence of TMB ≥10 mut/Mb was ~10%. Outcomes based on TMB cutpoint are reported in the Table. Conclusions: Data from this exploratory analysis from KEYNOTE-119 suggest a potential positive association between TMB and clinical benefit with pembro but not chemo in patients with mTNBC. Although precision is limited by sample size and the number of patients with TMB ≥10 mut/Mb, ORR and HRs for OS suggested a trend towards increased benefit with pembro versus chemo in patients with TMB ≥10 mut/Mb. Clinical trial information: NCT02555657.

TMB ≥10,
pembro (n = 14)
TMB ≥10,
chemo (n = 12)
TMB < 10,
pembro (n = 118)
TMB < 10,
chemo (n = 109)
ORR, % (95% CI)14.3% (4.0-39.9)8.3% (0.4-35.4)12.7% (7.9-19.9)12.8% (7.8-20.4)
PFS, HR (95% CI)1.14 (0.42-3.07)1.24 (0.92-1.67)
OS, HR (95% CI)0.58 (0.21-1.57)0.81 (0.61-1.07)

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2020 ASCO Virtual Scientific Program

Session Type

Poster Discussion Session

Session Title

Breast Cancer—Metastatic

Track

Breast Cancer

Sub Track

Triple-Negative

Clinical Trial Registration Number

NCT02555657

Citation

J Clin Oncol 38: 2020 (suppl; abstr 1013)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2020.38.15_suppl.1013

Abstract #

1013

Poster Bd #

98

Abstract Disclosures