ALPINE: Phase III zanubrutinib (BGB-3111) versus ibrutinib in patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma (CLL/SLL).

Authors

null

Peter Hillmen

St. James's University Hospital, Leeds, United Kingdom

Peter Hillmen , Jennifer R. Brown , John C. Byrd , Barbara Eichhorst , Nicole Lamanna , Susan Mary O'Brien , Lugui Qiu , Jason C. Paik , James D. Hilger , Jane Huang , Constantine S. Tam

Organizations

St. James's University Hospital, Leeds, United Kingdom, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, Department I for Internal Medicine, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany, Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbia University, New York, NY, Chao Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, Irvine, CA, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Peking Union Medical College, Tianjin, China, BeiGene USA, Inc., San Mateo, CA, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, St. Vincent's Hospital, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia

Research Funding

Pharmaceutical/Biotech Company

Background: Inhibition of Bruton tyrosine kinase (BTK) has emerged as a strategy for targeting B-cell malignancies including CLL/SLL. Zanubrutinib, an investigational inhibitor of BTK, was specifically engineered to optimize selectivity, half-life and solubility in an effort to decrease toxicities and better penetrate tumor tissue. Early clinical data suggested that zanubrutinib treatment in patients with treatment-naïve (TN; n = 16) or R/R (n = 50) CLL/SLL induced deep responses: 94% overall response rate (ORR), including 6% and 2% complete response rates in TN and R/R CLL/SLL, respectively (ICML 2017). This study is designed to evaluate whether zanubrutinib monotherapy exhibits non-inferior and potentially superior efficacy based on the ORR vs ibrutinib monotherapy in patients with R/R CLL/SLL. Methods: This ongoing phase 3, randomized, open-label, global study (NCT03734016, BGB-3111-305) is comparing the efficacy and safety of zanubrutinib vs ibrutinib in adult patients with R/R CLL/SLL. Approximately 400 patients will be randomized, 1:1 to each arm and stratified by age (< 65 vs ≥ 65 years), refractory status (yes vs no), geographic region, and del(17p)/TP53 mutation status (present vs absent). Key inclusion criteria include R/R CLL/SLL requiring treatment per iwCLL criteria, ECOG PS 0-2, and adequate hematologic function. The primary endpoint is ORR as determined by an independent review committee according to iwCLL guidelines, with modification for treatment-related lymphocytosis for patients with CLL and per 2014 Lugano Classification for patients with SLL. The study is powered to test the non-inferiority and superiority of the ORR for zanubrutinib vs ibrutinib. Secondary endpoints include progression-free survival, safety, duration of response, and overall survival. Recruitment is ongoing. Clinical trial information: NCT03734016

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2019 ASCO Annual Meeting

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Hematologic Malignancies—Lymphoma and Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia

Track

Hematologic Malignancies—Lymphoma and Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia

Sub Track

Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma

Clinical Trial Registration Number

NCT03734016

Citation

J Clin Oncol 37, 2019 (suppl; abstr TPS7572)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2019.37.15_suppl.TPS7572

Abstract #

TPS7572

Poster Bd #

323a

Abstract Disclosures