A comparative analysis of survival in patients with non-small cell lung cancer with brain metastases receiving intracranial radiation with and without immunotherapy.

Authors

null

Sunita Patruni

Allegheny Health Network, Pittsburgh, PA

Sunita Patruni , AHMED KHATTAB , Stephen Abel , Shaakir Hasan , Saleha Rizwan , Gene Grant Finley , Dulabh K. Monga , Vivek Verma , Rodney E Wegner

Organizations

Allegheny Health Network, Pittsburgh, PA, Department of Radiation Oncology, Allegheny Health Network Cancer Institute, Pittsburgh, PA, AHN, Pittsburgh, PA, Allegheny Health Network Cancer Institute, Pittsburgh, PA, Medical Oncology, Allegheny Health Network, Pittsburgh, PA, Division of Radiation Oncology, Allegheny Health Network Cancer Institute, Pittsburgh, PA

Research Funding

Other

Background: Many patients diagnosed with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) will develop intracranial metastasis, contributing significantly to morbidity and mortality. Immunotherapy (IMT) has emerged as the standard of care in select cases of metastatic NSCLC, though data investigating the survival impact of IMT and radiation (XRT) in these patients is limited. To characterize the survival impact of intracranial XRT and IMT in NSCLC patients with brain metastasis, we analyzed the National Cancer Database (NCDB). Methods: We queried the NCDB for patients with metastatic NSCLC having brain metastasis receiving intracranial XRT ± IMT. Univariable and multivariable analyses identified characteristics predictive of overall survival. Cox proportional hazard ratios with propensity matching mitigated indication bias between the two arms. Results: 13,998 NSCLC patients who received IMT (n = 545) or did not receive IMT (n = 13,545) were eligible for analysis. Univariable analysis demonstrated a median overall survival of 13.1 months (95% CI: 11.8-15.0) vs. 9.7 months (95% CI: 9.5-9.9) (p < 0.0001) and 3-year overall survival of 17% vs. 12% [p < 0.0001; HR: 0.77 (0.71-0.84)] in patients receiving and not receiving IMT respectively. Patients with N3 disease and those diagnosed between 2012 and 2014 were more likely to have received IMT. Receipt of IMT remained an independent predictor of increased survival on propensity score matched multivariable comparison (p = 0.0002). Conclusions: Receipt of IMT was an independent predictor of increased overall survival in patients with NSCLC having intracranial metastasis. Randomized, prospective studies are needed to further validate these findings.

Multivariable Cox Proportional Hazards Models for Overall Survival in NSCLC Patients Receiving Intracranial XRT with and without IMT.

CharacteristicHazard of Death (95% CI)p
Cox Model with Propensity Score
Grade
Well-differentiatedRef
Moderately-differentiated1.10 (0.95-1.27)0.2155
Poorly-differentiated
Extracranial Disease
1.28 (1.21-1.36)< 0.0001
NoRef
Yes1.17 (1.04-1.33)0.0102
Immunotherapy
NoRef
Yes0.82 (0.74-0.91)0.0002

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2019 ASCO Annual Meeting

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Lung Cancer—Non-Small Cell Metastatic

Track

Lung Cancer

Sub Track

Metastatic Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer

Citation

J Clin Oncol 37, 2019 (suppl; abstr 9025)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2019.37.15_suppl.9025

Abstract #

9025

Poster Bd #

348

Abstract Disclosures