Randomized phase III trial of adjuvant sequential chemotherapy plus radiotherapy versus adjuvant radiotherapy alone for locally advanced bladder cancer after radical cystectomy: Urothelial carcinoma subgroup analysis.

Authors

Mohamed Zaghloul

Mohamed S. Zaghloul

Egyptian National Cancer Institute, Cairo, Egypt

Mohamed S. Zaghloul , John Paul Christodouleas , Wei-Ting Hwang , Andrew Smith , Ahmed Abdalla , Hany William , Brian Christopher Baumann

Organizations

Egyptian National Cancer Institute, Cairo, Egypt, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, University of Pennsylvania, Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Philadelphia, PA, National Cancer Institute, Cairo, Cairo, Egypt, Ahmed Maher Teaching Hospital, Cairo, Egypt, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO

Research Funding

Other

Background: The role of post-operative chemotherapy after radical cystectomy (RC) is not well-defined. While some retrospective studies have shown a benefit, trials have been under-powered. In a phase III Egyptian trial, we evaluated the benefit of adjuvant chemo in locally advanced bladder cancer (LABC) patients treated with post-operative radiotherapy (PORT). In this study, we report a post-hoc subgroup analysis of patients with urothelial histology. We hypothesized that the addition of adjuvant chemo would improve disease-free survival (DFS) compared to PORT alone for LABC. Methods: A randomized phase III trial was opened to compare PORT vs. sequential chemo+PORT after RC for LABC & accrued from 2002–2008 at the NCI in Cairo. Bladder cancer pts ≤70 with at least one of the following factors (≥pT3b, grade 3, positive nodes) with negative margins after RC plus pelvic node dissection were eligible. RT was delivered using 3-D conformal RT to the pelvis to 45Gy in 1.5Gy BID. Chemo+PORT included 2 cycles of gemcitabine/cisplatin before & after RT. The primary endpoint was DFS. Secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS) & late GI toxicity. Results: 153 pts were enrolled. 53% had urothelial carcinoma (41 chemo+PORT & 40 PORT). In the urothelial cohort, the arms were well-balanced. Median age was 55. Median follow-up was 21 months for chemo+PORT (range 4-127) & 15 months for PORT (range 5-70). There were 2 local failures for PORT & none for chemo+PORT. Two-year DFS for chemo+PORT vs. PORT was 62% (95% CI 53-71%) & 48% (95% CI 39-58%), log-rank p=0.031. Two-year OS was 71% (95% CI 63-80%) & 51% (95% CI 40-61%), log-rank p=0.048. On multivariable analysis, chemo+PORT was a significant predictor of improved DFS (HR 0.42 95% CI 0.21-0.85, p=0.016) and OS (HR 0.45, 95% CI 0.21-0.96, p=0.039). In the entire cohort, late grade ≥3 GI toxicity was observed in 5 chemo+PORT patients (7%) & 6 PORT patients (8%). Conclusions: The addition of adjuvant chemo to PORT improved DFS & OS for LABC after RC with acceptable late GI toxicity. The results suggest a role for adjuvant therapies to address both local & distant disease. Clinical trial information: 01734798.

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2019 Genitourinary Cancers Symposium

Session Type

General Session

Session Title

General Session 5: Multimodality Treatment in Challenging Cases of Urothelial Carcinoma

Track

Urothelial Carcinoma

Sub Track

Urothelial Carcinoma

Clinical Trial Registration Number

01734798

Citation

J Clin Oncol 37, 2019 (suppl 7S; abstr 351)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2019.37.7_suppl.351

Abstract #

351

Abstract Disclosures

Similar Abstracts

First Author: Mohamed S. Zaghloul

First Author: Mohamed S. Zaghloul

First Author: Mohamed S. Zaghloul