Prospective trial of adjuvant chemotherapy versus adjuvant radiation therapy for locally advanced bladder cancer after radical cystectomy.

Authors

Mohamed Zaghloul

Mohamed S. Zaghloul

National Cancer Institute, Cairo, Egypt

Mohamed S. Zaghloul , John Paul Christodouleas , Tarek Zaghloul , Andrew Smith , Ahmed Abdalla , Hussein Mustafa Khaled , Hany William , Wei-Ting Hwang , Brian Christopher Baumann

Organizations

National Cancer Institute, Cairo, Egypt, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, University of Pennsylvania Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Philadelphia, PA, Ahmed Maher Teaching Hospital, Cairo, Egypt, University of Pennsylvania, Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Philadelphia, PA, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO

Research Funding

Other
National Cancer Institute, Cairo, Egypt.

Background: Some chemotherapy-naïve patients with locally advanced bladder cancer (LABC) after radical cystectomy (RC) are sufficiently de-conditioned that they are not candidates for adjuvant chemo or decline it. Adjuvant radiotherapy (RT) is an alternative (or complementary) adjuvant therapy, but is rarely performed, with most of these patients being observed. In a prospective trial, we compared RT vs adjuvant chemo & hypothesized that RT can achieve comparable disease-free survival (DFS). Methods: A randomized phase III trial at the National Cancer Institute (Cairo) compared adjuvant RT (standard of care in Egypt) vs. chemo+RT after RC for LABC. A 3rd arm, adjuvant chemo, was added later (gemcitabine/cisplatin x 4). Herein, we report results of RT vs adjuvant chemo. Patients ≤70 y/o with ≥1 of the following (pT3b/T4a, grade 3 or pN+) with negative margins after RC were eligible. RT was delivered with 3-D conformal RT to the pelvis (45 Gy in 1.5 Gy BID). Routine follow-up & pelvic CT q 6 months were performed. Post hoc non-inferiority exploratory analysis was performed. Results: 123 were enrolled (78 RT/45 chemo). 51% had urothelial carcinoma; 49% had squamous cell carcinoma. The arms were well-balanced except for gender (p=0.06). Two-year outcomes & overall adjusted hazard ratios (HR) for RT vs chemo were 54% vs 47% for DFS [HR 0.65(95%CI 0.35-1.19, p=0.16]; 92% vs 69% for local-regional recurrence-free survival [HR 0.28(95%CI 0.10-0.82), p=0.02]; 75% vs 79% for distant metastasis-free survival [HR 2.39(95%CI 0.94-6.09), p=0.07]; 61% vs 60% for overall survival [HR 0.94(95%CI 0.52-1.69), p=0.83]. In the urothelial cohort, there were no differences in DFS or OS. Late grade ≥3 GI toxicity was observed in 6 RT patients (8%) & 1 chemo patient (2%). Based on our data, there is a >90% probability that the true difference in 2-year DFS is <10%, the prespecified non-inferiority margin. Conclusions: This prospective study demonstrates that adjuvant RT has superior local control vs adjuvant chemo with no statistically significant differences in DFS or OS. Results suggest that RT can be an option for patients with LABC after RC where an alternative to chemo is desired by the patient or physician. Clinical trial information: NCT01734798

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2020 Genitourinary Cancers Symposium

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Poster Session B: Prostate Cancer; Urothelial Carcinoma; Penile, Urethral, Testicular, and Adrenal Cancers

Track

Urothelial Carcinoma,Adrenal Cancer,Penile Cancer,Prostate Cancer - Advanced,Prostate Cancer - Localized,Testicular Cancer,Urethral Cancer

Sub Track

Therapeutics

Clinical Trial Registration Number

NCT01734798

Citation

J Clin Oncol 38, 2020 (suppl 6; abstr 515)

Abstract #

515

Poster Bd #

J16

Abstract Disclosures

Similar Abstracts

First Author: Mohamed S. Zaghloul

First Author: Mohamed S. Zaghloul

First Author: Valentina Burgio