Enzalutamide versus flutamide for castration-resistant prostate cancer after combined androgen blockade therapy with bicalutamide: A multicenter randomized phase II trial (OCUU-CRPC study).

Authors

null

Taro Iguchi

Osaka City University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan

Taro Iguchi , Satoshi Tamada , Minoru Kato , Sayaka Yasuda , Yuichi Machida , Tetsuji Ohmachi , Keiichi Ishii , Hiroyuki Iwata , Shinji Yamamoto , Tomohiro Kanamaru , Kazuya Morimoto , Taro Hase , Koichiro Tashiroro , Koji Harimoto , Takashi Deguhi , Takahisa Adachi , Katsuki Iwamoto , Yoshinori Takegaki , Tatsuya Nakatani

Organizations

Osaka City University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan, Yao Municipal Hospital, Yao, Japan, Bellland General Hospital, Sakai, Japan, Osaka City General Hospital, Osaka, Japan, Itami Municipal Hospital, Itami, Japan, Ikuwakai Memorial Hospital, Osaka, Japan, Yao Tokushukai General Hospital, Yao, Japan, Osaka General Hospital of West Japan Railway Company, Osaka, Japan, Suita Municipal Hospital, Suita, Japan, Meijibashi Hospital, Matsubara, Japan, Fuchu Hospital, Izumi, Japan, PL Hospital, Tondabayashi, Japan, Osaka City Juso Hospital, Osaka, Japan, Ishikiriseiki Hospital, Higashiosaka, Japan, Minamiosaka Hospital, Osaka, Japan

Research Funding

Pharmaceutical/Biotech Company

Background: In Asia, including Japan, combined androgen blockade (CAB) therapy with bicalutamide is widely administered for metastatic prostate cancer. Alternative anti-androgen therapy (AAT) with flutamide after CAB therapy with bicalutamide was common before the androgen receptor-targeted therapy era. The objective of the OCUU-CRPC study was to compare the efficacy and safety between second-line hormonal therapy of enzalutamide and flutamide as alternative AAT after CAB therapy that included bicalutamide in patients with CRPC. Methods: A total of 104 patients with CRPC with or without distant metastases after disease progression who received CAB therapy with bicalutamide were randomly assigned at a 1:1 ratio according to distant metastases to the enzalutamide (160 mg/day) and flutamide (375 mg/day) groups. The primary endpoint for the drug efficacy was the response rate of prostate-specific antigen (PSA; i.e., declined by ≥50%) at 3 months. Results: Between January 2015 and February 2018, 103 patients were randomly assigned, 52 to enzalutamide and 51 to flutamide. 25 (48%) and 38 (75%) patients, respectively, discontinued their assigned treatment before study end, mainly due to progressive disease. Median follow-up time was 13.4 months (IQR 9.6–23.8) in the enzalutamide group and 17.0 months (9.7–24.4) in the flutamide group. Enzalutamide resulted in significant improvements in the response rate of PSA at 3 months (84.6% vs 31.4%; p< 0.001). Enzalutamide significantly improved in all secondary endpoints: the PSA progression rate at 3 months (HR, 0.17; 95% CI, 0.05 to 0.47; p< 0.01) and at 6 months (HR, 0.22; 95% CI, 0.09 to 0.50; p< 0.01); and PSA response rate at 6 months (75.0% vs 29.4%; p< 0.01); and time to PSA progression (median: not reached vs 6.6 months; HR, 0.29; 95% CI, 0.15 to 0.54; p< 0.01). The observed adverse event profile was consistent with that from phase III enzalutamide trials. Conclusions: Enzalutamide significantly reduced risk of progression compared with flutamide in patients with CRPC after CAB therapy with bicalutamide. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number. Clinical trial information: NCT02346578

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2019 Genitourinary Cancers Symposium

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Poster Session A: Prostate Cancer

Track

Prostate Cancer,Prostate Cancer

Sub Track

Prostate Cancer - Advanced Disease

Clinical Trial Registration Number

NCT02346578

Citation

J Clin Oncol 37, 2019 (suppl 7S; abstr 168)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2019.37.7_suppl.168

Abstract #

168

Poster Bd #

G11

Abstract Disclosures