University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
Padmanee Sharma , Russell Kent Pachynski , Vivek Narayan , Aude Flechon , Gwenaelle Gravis , Matt D. Galsky , Hakim Mahammedi , Akash Patnaik , Sumit Kumar Subudhi , Marika Ciprotti , Tao Duan , Abdel Saci , Sarah Hu , G. Celine Han , Karim Fizazi
Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitor monotherapy has shown limited clinical benefit in patients (pts) with prostate cancer, likely due to an immunologically “cold” tumor microenvironment. We report preplanned interim efficacy/safety for NIVO + IPI in pts with mCRPC from CheckMate 650. Methods: Asymptomatic/minimally symptomatic pts who progressed after 2nd-generation hormone therapy and have not received chemotherapy for mCRPC (cohort 1) and pts who progressed after taxane-based chemotherapy (cohort 2) were included. Treatment was NIVO 1 mg/kg + IPI 3 mg/kg Q3W for 4 doses, then NIVO 480 mg every 4 weeks. Coprimary endpoints: objective response rate (ORR) and radiographic PFS per PCWG2. Safety is a secondary endpoint. Exploratory endpoints include correlation of biomarkers with efficacy. Results: 78 pts had a minimum follow-up of 6 months; among pts with baseline measurable disease, ORR was 26% and 10% in cohorts 1 and 2 (Table). In both cohorts, ORR was higher in pts with PD-L1 ≥1%, DNA damage repair (DDR), homologous recombination deficiency (HRD), or above-median tumor mutational burden (TMB). Of all PSA responding pts (Table), 4 had PSA <0.2 ng/mL. Grade 3–4 treatment-related adverse events occurred in 39% and 51% of pts in cohorts 1 and 2; one grade 5 event occurred in each cohort. Conclusions: In a malignancy where immune checkpoint inhibitor monotherapy has previously shown limited success, NIVO + IPI demonstrated activity in pretreated pts with mCRPC, particularly in a biomarker-enriched population, with a safety profile consistent with this dosing schedule. Further study is warranted. Clinical trial information: NCT02985957
Cohort 1 | Cohort 2 | ||
---|---|---|---|
ORR % (95% CI), n/Na | 26 (10–48), 6/23 | 10 (2–27), 3/30 | |
PD-L1b | ≥1% | 2/4 (50) | 2/8 (25) |
<1% | 4/23 (17) | 0/20 (0) | |
DDRb | + | 2/5 (40) | 2/5 (40) |
– | 4/14 (29) | 1/9 (11) | |
HRDb | + | 2/3 (67) | 1/2 (50) |
– | 4/16 (25) | 2/12 (17) | |
TMBb,c | High | 6/10 (60) | 3/6 (50) |
Low | 0/9 (0) | 0/8 (0) | |
PSA responsed | 6/28 (21) | 5/40 (13) |
n/N (%) unless noted aIn pts with baseline measurable disease
bIn pts with quantifiable tissue
cHigh/low TMB = above/below median (74.5 mutations/pt)
dConfirmed/unconfirmed PSA decline ≥50% from baseline in pts with baseline and ≥1 postbaseline PSA result
Disclaimer
This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org
Abstract Disclosures
2023 ASCO Genitourinary Cancers Symposium
First Author: Padmanee Sharma
2023 ASCO Genitourinary Cancers Symposium
First Author: Padmanee Sharma
2024 ASCO Gastrointestinal Cancers Symposium
First Author: Thierry Andre
2024 ASCO Gastrointestinal Cancers Symposium
First Author: Ming Lei