Integration of palliative care consultation for patients with malignant bowel obstruction in gynecologic oncology: Qualitative approach to understand provider perspectives.

Authors

null

Claire Hoppenot

University of Chicago, Chicago, IL

Claire Hoppenot, Julie Chor, Fay J. Hlubocky, Seiko Diane Yamada, Nita Karnik Lee

Organizations

University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL, University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, IL, Univ of Chicago, Chicago, IL

Research Funding

Other

Background: Gynecologic oncologists’ (GO) approaches to palliative care team (PCT) consultation for managing patients with malignant bowel obstruction (MBO) from recurrent gynecologic cancer remains unknown. Methods: GO practicing in a large metropolitan area underwent semi-structured interviews exploring their approaches to PCT involvement at the time of diagnosis of a MBO and factors leading to specific recommendations. Interviews were analyzed using theoretical and open coding qualitative analysis. Results: 15 GO completed interviews. They were in academic (93%), urban (67%) settings and at a range of timepoints in their career. GO expressed mixed feelings regarding PCT consultation for their patients with MBO. Many were comfortable managing symptoms (pain, nausea) and limited consultations to uncontrolled symptoms. Others involved PCT for ongoing support regardless of symptom severity. GO were less likely to involve PCT to help with goal-setting discussions. Many GO held a “the earlier the better” stance, preferring to involve PCT in the outpatient setting. At a high-risk decision-point, such as MBO, these physicians felt that PCT consultation was overdue. In this setting, most participants reserved PCT consultations only for patients who were not surgical candidates. Barriers to PCT consultation for women with MBO centered around GO concerns that involving another team fragments care. Participants feared involving PCT would complicate patients’ experiences by requiring additional appointments, suggesting potential abandonment from their GO, and including an additional, potentially conflicting, source of information. Many GO mentioned they chose gynecologic oncology for the continuity of care and leading role in a patient’s cancer care. Conclusions: Overall, GO expressed comfort involving PCT outside of critical decision-points, yet were reticent to involve PCT at the time of MBO due to concerns of requiring the patient to deal with another team. Early incorporation of the PCT through a standardized co-management system in a GO outpatient clinic may improve communication and reduce barriers to PCT involvement.

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2018 Palliative and Supportive Care in Oncology Symposium

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Poster Session A: Communication and Shared Decision Making; Integration and Delivery of Palliative and Supportive Care; and Psychosocial and Spiritual/Cultural Assessment and Management

Track

Integration and Delivery of Palliative and Supportive Care,Communication and Shared Decision Making,Psychosocial and Spiritual/Cultural Assessment and Management

Sub Track

Integration and Delivery of Palliative and Supportive Care

Citation

J Clin Oncol 36, 2018 (suppl 34; abstr 116)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2018.36.34_suppl.116

Abstract #

116

Poster Bd #

E4

Abstract Disclosures

Similar Abstracts

First Author: Tiffany M. Statler

Abstract

2022 ASCO Annual Meeting

Palliative specialty care availability for adults in community oncology practices.

First Author: Tiffany M. Statler

First Author: Jhalak Dholakia