University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
Ashley Graul , Ashley Ford Haggerty , Carolyn Stickley , Pallavi Kumar , Knashawn Morales , Hillary Bogner , Robert Burger , Morgan Mark , Emily Ko
Background: This was a randomized control trial to estimate the effect of an interventional video on improving palliative care knowledge and acceptability of outpatient services in gynecologic oncology patients. Methods: Women receiving active treatment for gynecologic malignancy (persistent or progressive disease despite primary treatment) were recruited at an academic tertiary care center from 2/2018 to 1/2019 and randomized to: palliative care educational video or non-directive cancer center informational video (control). The primary outcome was desire for referral to palliative care. Function and knowledge were assessed using the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy (FACT-G) and the Palliative Care Knowledge Scales. Data analyses were performed using t-tests, Wilcoxon rank sum or Fisher’s exact tests with significance level of α=0.05. Results: 111 women were enrolled. Demographic characteristics were equally distributed between groups (mean age 63.4 vs 65.4 years; 78% vs 82% Caucasian, 58% vs 68% stage III, 71% vs 64% ovarian cancer, 65% vs 72% platinum-sensitive). There was no statistical difference in knowledge scores or in desire for referral to palliative care (29% vs 27%; p=0.79). Secondary analysis showed a statistically significant increase in utilization of palliative care services compared to historic institutional data (8.8% to 29.7%; p=<0.001). Further, those that desired referral had significantly worse FACT-G scores at time of referral choice (table). Conclusions: Use of a palliative care educational video did not increase knowledge or acceptability of palliative care services within this RCT. However, the rate of patients seeking palliative care referral tripled compared to historic rates. Further studies should investigate whether discussion regarding palliative care services alone may increase desire for referral, and if use of Fact-G scores may identify patients in greatest need of services.
Function and knowledge at time of referral choice | Chose Referral n=31 (Median, IQR) | Did Not Choose Referral n=80 (Median, IQR) | p-value |
---|---|---|---|
Physical Welling Being Sub-score | 24.0 (18.0, 25.0) | 19.0 (14.0, 23.0) | 0.007 |
Social Well Being Sub-score | 25.8 (23.9, 28.0) | 24.0 (18.0, 26.0) | 0.005 |
Emotional Well Being Sub-score | 19.0 (15.5, 22.0) | 17.0 (11.0, 20.0) | 0.008 |
Functional Well Being Sub-score | 23.0 (17.0, 26.0) | 17.0 (14.0, 21.0) | 0.002 |
FACT-G Total Score | 89.0 (74.8, 97.0) | 74.3 (63.0, 86.0) | <0.001 |
PaCKs Knowledge Score | 12.0 (12.0, 13.0) | 12.0 (12.0, 13.0) | 0.98 |
Disclaimer
This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org
Abstract Disclosures
2023 ASCO Annual Meeting
First Author: Tiffany M. Statler
2023 ASCO Quality Care Symposium
First Author: Tara L. Kaufmann
2023 ASCO Quality Care Symposium
First Author: Lindsay Schlichte
2024 ASCO Annual Meeting
First Author: Rubina Ratnaparkhi