Optimizing the use of a nutrition screening tool for oncology patients.

Authors

null

Carol Parrales

Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, Miami, FL

Carol Parrales, Maritza Cardena Alencar, Jessica MacIntyre, Chinny Trivedi, Patricia Araujo

Organizations

Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, Miami, FL, Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL

Research Funding

Other

Background: Oncology infusion centers play a crucial role in detection of malnutrition. In one month, the Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center chemotherapy infusion center in Miami (SCCC CTU) treats over 400 oncology patients. Research shows that 40-80% of patients with a cancer diagnosis are malnourished (Isenring et al., 2006). In April, 1.89% of patients seen at the Miami CTU were referred to an oncology nutritionist. The goal was to increase the percentage of patients referred by 2% by June through adequate screening and referral. Methods: SCCC Miami CTU nursing staff’s knowledge on the use of the Malnutrition Screening Tool (MST) and the referral process were assessed through a survey. The survey also functioned as an educational instrument. Additionally, one-on-one discussions about the referral process were conducted with the SCCC CTU nurse practitioners. Results: The survey was available to CTU RNs with a 35% completion rate. Results portrayed that 82.35% were aware of the MST screening tool; however, 88.25% were unaware of the appropriate code to refer patients to nutritionist. Therefore, if nutritional consults were placed, it was unlikely that the nutritionist would receive the request. Identified obstacles included having to call a provider to initiate a consult, lack of time for proper assessment and the availability of a nutritionist. Conclusions: Although results did not yield a significant increase of referrals through the use of the appropriate code, there was a 1.22% increase on the overall referrals placed. Lack of training and knowledge on the MST, improper use of the referral code, and the intricacy of the workflow, were contributing factors to the inadequacy in screening and referral process. Participation of all staff in education initiatives and interventions should be a vital component in improving quality care of oncology patients.

Patients Referred to Oncology Nutrition

April
2018
June
2018
Patients seen at SCCC Miami CTU495445
Patients referred in a previous encounter2127
Patients referred via “REF 250- Adult Oncology Nutrition”12
Patients referred via email from the CTU811
Percentage of patients referred to Nutrition1.89%3.11%

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2018 Palliative and Supportive Care in Oncology Symposium

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Poster Session A: Communication and Shared Decision Making; Integration and Delivery of Palliative and Supportive Care; and Psychosocial and Spiritual/Cultural Assessment and Management

Track

Integration and Delivery of Palliative and Supportive Care,Communication and Shared Decision Making,Psychosocial and Spiritual/Cultural Assessment and Management

Sub Track

Integration and Delivery of Palliative and Supportive Care

Citation

J Clin Oncol 36, 2018 (suppl 34; abstr 101)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2018.36.34_suppl.101

Abstract #

101

Poster Bd #

D5

Abstract Disclosures

Similar Abstracts

Abstract

2022 ASCO Annual Meeting

Malnutrition screening in cancer patients on chemotherapy.

First Author: Sindusha R Gudipally

Abstract

2022 ASCO Quality Care Symposium

Automated malnutrition screening in a multisite cancer center.

First Author: Kunal C. Kadakia