Automated malnutrition screening in a multisite cancer center.

Authors

null

Kunal C. Kadakia

Department of Solid Tumor Oncology and Supportive Oncology, Levine Cancer Institute, Atrium Health, Charlotte, NC

Kunal C. Kadakia, Michele Szafranski, Patrick L. Meadors, Aynur Aktas, Declan Walsh

Organizations

Department of Solid Tumor Oncology and Supportive Oncology, Levine Cancer Institute, Atrium Health, Charlotte, NC, Department of Supportive Oncology, Levine Cancer Institute, Atrium Health, Charlotte, NC

Research Funding

No funding received
None.

Background: Malnutrition (MN) negatively impacts patients’ tolerance to anti-cancer therapies and clinical outcomes. Registered dietitian nutritionists (RDNs) are integral to establishing personalized nutritional plans but are a limited resource at cancer centers. The optimal method for operationalizing MN screening and assessment by an RDN is not established. The present study describes the experience of MN screening and automated RDN assessment at Atrium Health’s Levine Cancer Institute. Methods: MN screening using the Malnutrition Screening Tool (MST) was added to our institution’s electronic distress screening process in May 2017. Automated email alerts to review electronic medical records (EMR) of those with high risk for MN (MST ≥3 of 5; H-MST) before formal RDN evaluation were added in October 2017. RDN reviewed the EMR to identify malnutrition based on internationally accepted guidelines. Here we describe our experience over a 8-month period from May 2019 through December 2019. Results: Among 4009 unique patients who completed the MST, 2953 (74%) had a score of 0-2, 1056 (26%) had H-MST with scores of 3, 4, and 5 in 514 (13%), 349 (9%), and 193 (5%), respectively. Among H-MST screens, automated RDN evaluation occurred in 512 (48%). EMR review by the RDN revealed that 242 (47%) met MN criteria for formal RDN evaluation. The reasons for exclusion from formal RDN evaluation included no weight loss documented (114, 22%), non-malignant condition (107, 21%), and others (49,10%) (deceased, hospitalized, no reason listed, or enrolled in hospice). Of those who were planned for formal RDN evaluation, 97 (40%) underwent phone evaluation, 75 (31%) had already established care with an RDN, 41 (17%) underwent in-person evaluation, and 29 (12%) were unable to be contacted. Conclusions: Using electronic screening, 26% of cancer patients are at high risk for MN at diagnosis. Automated RDN review of H-MST screened patients can improve the referral process and optimize limited RDN availability. The current process allows formal RDN evaluations on those with the greatest MN risk. Malnutrition screening protocols focused on the highest risk cancers might further improve this process. More research is needed to optimize RDN staffing and referral practices.

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2022 ASCO Quality Care Symposium

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Poster Session B

Track

Palliative and Supportive Care,Technology and Innovation in Quality of Care,Quality, Safety, and Implementation Science

Sub Track

Tools for Care Coordination

Citation

J Clin Oncol 40, 2022 (suppl 28; abstr 415)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2022.40.28_suppl.415

Abstract #

415

Poster Bd #

F18

Abstract Disclosures

Similar Abstracts

Abstract

2020 ASCO Virtual Scientific Program

Distress screening through PROMIS at an academic cancer center and network site: Implementation of a hybrid model.

First Author: Mohana Roy

Abstract

2021 ASCO Annual Meeting

Screened social risk factors & screening acceptability among oncology patients in Philadelphia.

First Author: Jessica Davis

First Author: Kunal C. Kadakia