Dynamic genomic instability modulation by neoadjuvant therapy in early breast cancer (GEICAM/2006-03_2006-14).

Authors

null

Emilio Alba

Hospital Clínico Universitario Virgen de la Victoria. GEICAM Spanish Breast Cancer Group., Malaga, Spain

Emilio Alba , Oscar M Rueda , Ana Lluch , Joan Albanell , Suet-Feung Chin , Jose Ignacio Chacon , Lourdes Calvo , Juan De La Haba , Begona Bermejo , Nuria Ribelles , Pedro Sanchez Rovira , Arrate Plazaola , Agusti Barnadas , Eva Maria Carrasco , Jesus Herranz , Massimo Chiesa , Rosalia Caballero , Angela Santonja Climent , Federico Rojo , Carlos Caldas

Organizations

Hospital Clínico Universitario Virgen de la Victoria. GEICAM Spanish Breast Cancer Group., Malaga, Spain, Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, Cambridge, United Kingdom, Hospital Clinico Universitario de Valencia; Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Oncología; CIBERONC-ISCIII; GEICAM Spanish Breast Cancer Group, Valencia, Spain, Hospital del Mar; GEICAM Spanish Breast Cancer Group, Barcelona, Spain, Cancer Research UK, Cambridge Research Institute, Cambridge, United Kingdom, Hospital Virgen de la Salud; GEICAM Spanish Breast Cancer Group, Toledo, Spain, Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de A Coruña. GEICAM Spanish Breast Cancer Group., A Coruna, Spain, Biomedical Research Institute Maimonides.Hospital UniversitarioReina Sofia,Universidad de Cordoba, Spain.Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Oncología, CIBERONC-ISCIII. GEICAM, Spanish Breast Cancer Group, Spain, Cordoba, Spain, IBIMA, Unidad de Gestión Clínica Intercentros de Oncología, Hospitales Universitarios Regional y Virgen de la Victoria de Málaga, Malaga, Spain, Medical Oncology. Complejo Hospitalario de Jaén, Jaen, Spain, Onkologikoa. GEICAM Spanish Breast Cancer Group., San Sebastian-Donostia, Spain, Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Barcelona; Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Oncología, CIBERONC-ISCIII; GEICAM Spanish Breast Cancer Group, Barcelona, Spain, GEICAM Spanish Breast Cancer Group, Madrid, Spain, Hospital Clínico Universitario Virgen de la Victoria, Málaga, Spain, Fundación Jiménez Díaz,Madrid.Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Oncología, Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Oncología, CIBERONC-ISCIII, Madrid, Spain, Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, Li Ka Shing Centre, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom

Research Funding

Other Foundation

Background: Genomic instability (GI) drives tumor development, generates selective clonal competence and enhances cancer aggressiveness. Copy Number Alterations (CNAs) data from a cohort of pre- and post-treatment (ttm) breast cancer (BC) tumors from patients (pts) in neoadjuvant trials GEICAM/2006-03 (NCT00432172) and GEICAM/2006-14 (NCT00841828) were used to obtain a GI Index for each sample. We analyzed the variation of GI index induced by therapy and their associations with tumor phenotype. Methods: GEICAM/2006-03 HER2-negative pts were selectively treated according to clinical subtypes: triple negative (TN) pts were treated with standard taxane/anthracycline-based chemotherapy (TA-CT) +/- carboplatin, while luminal patients were randomized to TA-CT vs. hormonotherapy; GEICAM/2006-14 HER2+ pts received TA-CT plus anti-HER2 therapy. Shallow-whole genome Illumina sequencing DNA data from 204 paraffin-BC (100 pre- and 104 post-ttm tumors) were segmented to obtain CNAs. The area under the segmentation curve (sum of segmented mean normalized by CNAs number) was calculated for each sample as index of GI. Differences between GI indexes in pre- and post-ttm samples were analyzed using Wilcoxon test. Results: A significant reduction in GI index was observed after ttm compared to pre-therapy samples (p = 5.1e-07), which was confirmed in a subset of pre/post-therapy paired tumors (N = 39, p = 0.0034). Luminal (61%) tumors revealed a significant decrease in GI index, both in overall population (median GI index: 0.141 pre-ttm vs 0.068 post-ttm, p = 1e-09) and in paired samples (0.126 vs 0.072, p = 0.00013). Similarly, HER2+ (9%) tumors showed a trend towards GI reduction (0.143 vs 0.079, p = 0.085). In contrast, TN (30%) cases presented an increasing trend in GI index in the residual tumor (0.132 pre- vs 0.17 post-ttm, p = 0.68). Conclusions: Our data suggest that GI could be a direct target of neoadjuvant therapy in BC. Treatment seems selectively eliminate tumor cells with higher genomic aberrations in luminal and HER2+ BC, resulting in a reduction of GI index in the residuals tumors. In contrast, according to previous publications, we suggest that GI could be a mechanism of adaptative CT resistance in TNBC. Clinical trial information: GEICAM/2006-03 NCT00432172. GEICAM/2006-14 NCT00841828.

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2018 ASCO Annual Meeting

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Breast Cancer—Local/Regional/Adjuvant

Track

Breast Cancer

Sub Track

Neoadjuvant Therapy

Clinical Trial Registration Number

GEICAM/2006-03 NCT00432172. GEICAM/2006-14 NCT00841828

Citation

J Clin Oncol 36, 2018 (suppl; abstr 592)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2018.36.15_suppl.592

Abstract #

592

Poster Bd #

84

Abstract Disclosures