Network metanalysis and cost-effectiveness of abiraterone, docetaxel or placebo plus androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) for hormone-sensitive advanced prostate cancer.

Authors

Pedro Nazareth Aguiar, Jr

Pedro Nazareth Aguiar

Faculdade de Medicina do ABC, Santo Andre, Brazil

Pedro Nazareth Aguiar , Pui San Tan , Sarah Simko , CARMELIA MARIA NOIA Barreto , Barbara Gutierres Aguiar , Auro Del Giglio , Gilberto Lopes

Organizations

Faculdade de Medicina do ABC, Santo Andre, Brazil, Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, Instituto Avanços em Medicina, Sao Paulo, Brazil, Paulista University, Sao Paulo, Brazil, Faculdade de Medicina do ABC, Santo André, Brazil, Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Miami Health System, Miami, FL

Research Funding

Other

Background: Prostate cancer is the leading neoplasm among men worldwide. The objective of this study is to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of the addition of chemotherapy or abiraterone to ADT after a network meta-analysis and an indirect comparison between chemotherapy and abiraterone. Methods: We made a literature review and included studies that evaluated the addition of docetaxel or abiraterone to ADT versus ADT alone for patients with castration-sensitive metastatic prostate cancer. Studies’ outcomes were modeled on a logarithmic scale using the Bayesian hierarchical model for indirect comparisons between interventions. Then, we developed an analytical model to determine the cost-effectiveness of the addition of docetaxel or abiraterone versus ADT alone. Direct and indirect costs were included in the model considering Brazilian costs. Results: Four clinical trials were included in the network meta-analysis. Evidence suggests that the addition of abiraterone to ADT is the best therapeutic option in terms of OS ( > 95% probability; HR 0,81; 95% CrI 0,66 – 1,00) and FFS ( > 99% probability; HR 0,50; 95% CrI 0,40 – 0,62) compared to ADT plus docetaxel. Abiraterone plus ADT had fewer cases of febrile neutropenia than docetaxel plus ADT (1% versus 15%). Compared to ADT alone, the addition of chemotherapy generated 0.492 QALY and the addition of abiraterone generated 0.999 QALY. Abiraterone led to a QALY gain of 0.506 compared to docetaxel. In Brazil, the incremental costs per QALY were $40,500, $100,251 and $173,145, respectively. At current costs, docetaxel plus ADT is more cost-effective than abiraterone plus ADT. The factors that had the greatest influence on cost-effectiveness were the overall survival and failure-free survival confidence intervals. Price discounts on abiraterone purchasing was the factor that led to the greatest impact on the incremental cost (ranging from $100,000 to $40,000). Conclusions: We conclude that the addition of chemotherapy to ADT is more cost-effective than the addition of abiraterone to ADT. However, discounts on abiraterone cost might improve cost-effectiveness.

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2018 ASCO Annual Meeting

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Health Services Research, Clinical Informatics, and Quality of Care

Track

Quality Care/Health Services Research

Sub Track

Value/Cost of Care

Citation

J Clin Oncol 36, 2018 (suppl; abstr 6615)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2018.36.15_suppl.6615

Abstract #

6615

Poster Bd #

440

Abstract Disclosures