Overall survival (OS) update of the double-blind placebo (PBO)-controlled randomized phase 2 LOTUS trial of first-line ipatasertib (IPAT) + paclitaxel (PAC) for locally advanced/metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (mTNBC).

Authors

Rebecca Dent

Rebecca Dent

National Cancer Center, Singapore

Rebecca Dent , Seock-Ah Im , Marc Espie , Sibel Blau , Antoinette R. Tan , Steven J. Isakoff , Mafalda Oliveira , Cristina Saura , Matthew Wongchenko , Amy V. Kapp , Wai Y. Chan , Stina M. Singel , Daniel J. Maslyar , Jose Baselga , Sung-Bae Kim

Organizations

National Cancer Center, Singapore, Seoul National University Hospital, and Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea, Republic of (South), Hospital Saint Louis, Breast Disease Center, Paris, France, Northwest Medical Specialties, Puyallup, WA, Levine Cancer Institute, Charlotte, NC, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, Vall d’Hebron University Hospital, Vall d’Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO), Barcelona, Spain, Genentech, Inc., South San Francisco, CA, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea, Republic of (South)

Research Funding

Pharmaceutical/Biotech Company

Background: In LOTUS (NCT02162719), adding the oral AKT inhibitor IPAT to first-line PAC for mTNBC improved progression-free survival (PFS; primary endpoint) [Kim, Lancet Oncol 2017]. The stratified PFS hazard ratio (HR) in the intent-to-treat (ITT) population (n = 124) was 0.60 (95% CI 0.37–0.98; p = 0.037; median PFS 6.2 vs 4.9 months with IPAT vs PBO, respectively). In prespecified analyses of patients (pts) with PIK3CA/AKT1/PTEN-altered tumors, the unstratified PFS HR was 0.44 (95% CI 0.20–0.99; median 9.0 vs 4.9 months). We now report updated OS results in the ITT population after OS events in ~50% of pts. OS results in the PIK3CA/AKT1/PTEN-altered subgroup are immature. Methods: Eligible pts had measurable inoperable mTNBC previously untreated with systemic therapy. Pts were stratified by prior (neo)adjuvant therapy, chemotherapy-free interval (6–12 months vs > 12 months vs not applicable) and tumor IHC PTEN status, and randomized 1:1 to PAC 80 mg/m2 (d1, 8, & 15) with either IPAT 400 mg or PBO (d1–21) q28d until progression or unacceptable toxicity. OS was a prespecified secondary endpoint. Results: The table shows results after 23 months’ follow-up (data cutoff 26 July, 2017). No new safety signals were seen. Conclusions: The previously observed PFS improvement with IPAT was followed by a trend toward improved OS (~5-month difference in the medians) at the updated OS analysis. Post-progression therapy was similar. These findings support further evaluation of first-line IPAT + PAC for mTNBC in the ongoing IPATunity130 (NCT03337724) randomized phase 3 trial. Final OS results from LOTUS are expected in 2019. Clinical trial information: NCT02162719

ParameterIPAT + PAC (n = 62)PBO + PAC (n = 62)
OS events, n (%)33 (53)35 (56)
Median OS, months (95% CI)23.1 (18.6–28.1)18.4 (15.1–29.1)
OS hazard ratio (95% CI)Stratified: 0.62 (0.37–1.05)
Unstratified: 0.77 (0.48–1.25)
1-year OS rate, % (95% CI)83 (73–93)70 (58–81)
Post-progression systemic anti-cancer therapy, n (%)47 (76)55 (89)
    Immunotherapy7 (11)7 (11)
Adverse event leading to treatment discontinuation, n (%)a
    IPAT/PBO4 (7)1 (2)
    PAC7 (11)6 (10)

an = 61 in IPAT + PAC arm

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2018 ASCO Annual Meeting

Session Type

Oral Abstract Session

Session Title

Breast Cancer—Metastatic

Track

Breast Cancer

Sub Track

Triple-Negative

Clinical Trial Registration Number

NCT02162719

Citation

J Clin Oncol 36, 2018 (suppl; abstr 1008)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2018.36.15_suppl.1008

Abstract #

1008

Abstract Disclosures