Division of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Centre, Singapore, Singapore
Rebecca Alexandra Dent , Sung-Bae Kim , Seock-Ah Im , Marc Espie , Sibel Blau , Antoinette R. Tan , Steven Isakoff , Mafalda Oliveira , Cristina Saura , Matthew Wongchenko , Amy V. Kapp , Wai Y. Chan , Stina M. Singel , Daniel J. Maslyar , Jose Baselga
Background: The oral Akt inhibitor IPAT is being evaluated in cancers with a high prevalence of PI3K/Akt pathway activation, including TNBC. Methods: Eligible patients (pts) had measurable inoperable locally advanced/metastatic TNBC previously untreated with systemic therapy. Pts were stratified by prior (neo)adjuvant therapy, chemotherapy-free interval and tumor PTEN status, and randomized 1:1 to P 80 mg/m2 (d1, 8 & 15) with either IPAT 400 mg or PBO (d1–21) q28d until progression or unacceptable toxicity. Co-primary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS) in the ITT population and pts with PTEN-low tumors by IHC. Secondary endpoints included objective response rate (ORR), duration of response (DoR) and overall survival in the ITT and IHC PTEN-low populations, efficacy in pts with PIK3CA/AKT1/PTEN-altered tumors by next-generation sequencing (NGS), and safety. Results: Baseline characteristics were generally balanced between arms. Efficacy is shown below. The most common grade ≥3 AEs (grouped terms) were diarrhea (23% IPAT+P vs 0% PBO+P; no grade 4 or colitis in either arm), neutropenia (18% vs 8%), asthenia (5% vs 6%), peripheral neuropathy (5% vs 5%) and pneumonia (5% vs 0%). More pts receiving IPAT+P than PBO+P had an AE leading to dose reduction of IPAT/PBO (21% vs 6%) or P (38% vs 11%) but median cumulative dose intensity was similar (IPAT/PBO: 99% vs 100%; P: 100% vs 100%). AEs led to IPAT/PBO discontinuation in 13% vs 11% of pts, respectively; 2 pts (3%) discontinued IPAT for grade 3 diarrhea. Conclusions: Adding IPAT to P for TNBC modestly improved PFS in the ITT pts. The effect was more pronounced in the prespecified subgroup with PIK3CA/AKT1/PTEN alterations, warranting further evaluation of IPAT in these pts. AEs were manageable. Clinical trial information: NCT02162719
Endpoint | ITT | PTEN low by IHC | PIK3CA/AKT1/PTEN-altered by NGS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IPAT+P | PBO+P | IPAT+P | PBO+P | IPAT+P | PBO+P | |
PFS | ||||||
Events/pts (%) | 39/62 (63) | 45/62 (73) | 16/25 (64) | 18/23 (78) | 12/26 (46) | 13/16 (81) |
Median, mo | 6.2 | 4.9 | 6.2 | 3.7 | 9.0 | 4.9 |
HR (90% CI) | 0.60 (0.40–0.91)a | 0.68 (0.39–1.21)b | 0.44 (0.22–0.87)b | |||
ORR, % | 40 | 32 | 48 | 26 | 50 | 44 |
Median DoR, mo | 7.9 | 7.4 | 6.5 | 7.5 | 11.2 | 6.1 |
aStratified, bUnstratified.
Disclaimer
This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org
Abstract Disclosures
2023 ASCO Annual Meeting
First Author: Bradley Corr
2018 ASCO Annual Meeting
First Author: Rebecca Dent
2023 ASCO Annual Meeting
First Author: Zefei Jiang
2023 ASCO Annual Meeting
First Author: Sherry Shen