Pharmacokinetic (PK) and exposure-response (ER) analysis of pertuzumab (P) in patients (pts) with HER2-positive metastatic gastroesophageal junction and gastric cancer (mGEJC/GC).

Authors

null

Whitney Paige Kirschbrown

Genentech Inc., South San Francisco, CA

Whitney Paige Kirschbrown , Bei Wang , Ihsan Nijem , Atsushi Ohtsu , Paulo M. Hoff , Manish A. Shah , Lin Shen , Yoon-Koo Kang , Josep Tabernero , Sandhya Girish , Amit Garg

Organizations

Genentech Inc., South San Francisco, CA, Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Japan, Instituto do Cancer de São Paulo, Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil, Meyer Cancer Center at Weill Cornell Medical College, Medical Oncology/Solid Tumor Program, New York, NY, Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, Beijing, China, Department of Oncology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea, Republic of (South), Vall d’Hebron University Hospital and Institute of Oncology (VHIO), Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain

Research Funding

Pharmaceutical/Biotech Company

Background: The phase 2a, dose-finding JOSHUA study reported increased P clearance (CL; 37% lower P steady-state Cmin [Cmin,ss]) in pts with HER2+ mGEJC/GC vs metastatic breast cancer (MBC). Based on these data, 840 mg q3w was selected for testing in the phase 3 JACOB study (NCT01774786) to achieve similar P concentrations (conc) to BC studies with the 840 mg then 420 mg q3w P dose. In JACOB, while there was evidence of treatment activity, addition of P to trastuzumab (H) and chemotherapy (CT) in 1st-line therapy did not significantly improve overall survival (OS) vs placebo (Pla)+H+CT (hazard ratio: 0.84 [95% CI 0.71–1.00], median OS 17.5 vs 14.2 months), in pts with HER2+ mGEJC/GC. Here we report the PK and ER analysis of P in JACOB. Methods: PK samples were collected at Cycles 1–4, 6, and 8 (predose); Cycles 1, 2, 4 and 8 (postdose); and at follow-up. P+H peak and trough conc were summarized by descriptive statistics and % pts with a Cmin,ss≥20 μg/mL (target conc) tabulated. PK exposure was compared across geographic regions. The Kaplan-Meier method and a log-rank test were used to assess OS across Cmin quartiles. PK drug-drug interactions (DDIs) were assessed using serum Cmin geometric mean ratios. Results: Pts with ≥1 dose of P or H and ≥1 PK sample were included (P: n = 374 [P+H+CT]; H: n = 372 [P+H+CT] and 375 [Pla+H+CT]). Mean Cmin,ss Cycle 6 for P was 114±51.8 μg/mL, 99.3% of pts had Cmin,ss for P ≥20 μg/mL. There were no differences in OS across Cycle 1 and Cycle 6 (s-s) P Cmin quartiles (Q1: 0.075–30.6, Q2: 30.6–39.8, Q3: 39.8–51.9, Q4: 51.9–318; n = 349, P = 0.52 and Q1: 0.075–77.1, Q2: 77.1–110, Q3: 110–145, Q4: 145–450; n = 274, P = 0.78, respectively). Mean Cmin,ss was comparable across geographic regions. No apparent DDIs were observed for CT on P Cmin,ss, or P on H. Two of 349 (0.6%) evaluable pts tested positive for anti-drug antibodies to P; there was no impact on P PK. Conclusions: In JACOB, the 840 mg q3w P dose achieved target Cmin,ss in > 99% pts with HER2+ mGEJC/GC. ER analysis showed no correlation between P trough conc and OS. PK data were consistent with prior GC (P: 840 mg) and BC (P: 840 mg/420 mg) studies and higher P CL in HER2+ mGEJC/GC vs other tumor types. Clinical trial information: NCT01774786

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2018 ASCO Annual Meeting

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Developmental Therapeutics—Clinical Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics

Track

Developmental Therapeutics and Translational Research

Sub Track

Pharmacology

Clinical Trial Registration Number

NCT01774786

Citation

J Clin Oncol 36, 2018 (suppl; abstr 2564)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2018.36.15_suppl.2564

Abstract #

2564

Poster Bd #

390

Abstract Disclosures