Phase 1 study to evaluate safety and efficacy of nivolumab (nivo) + ipilimumab (ipi) + external beam radiotherapy (RT) in patients with metastatic melanoma.

Authors

null

Michael A. Postow

Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY

Michael A. Postow , Susan Jane Knox , Debra Goldman , Katherine Panageas , Darragh Halpenny , Danielle McCabe , Mary J. Macri , Paul Schwarzenberger , Toni Ricciardi , Aileen Ryan , Ralph Rudolph Venhaus , Christopher Andrew Barker

Organizations

Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, Ludwig Cancer Research, New York, NY, Ludwig Institute for Cancer Research, New York, NY, Ludwig Institute for Cancer Research, Ltd., New York, NY

Research Funding

Other Foundation

Background: RT causes immunologic effects that enhance the efficacy of immune checkpoint blockade in preclinical models. No prospective clinical trial data exist for the safety and efficacy of combining RT with the nivo + ipi combination. Methods: We conducted a prospective study (NCT02659540) where patients with metastatic melanoma were treated with nivo (1 mg/kg) + ipi (3 mg/kg) every 3 weeks (Q3W) for up to 4 doses, with optional nivo maintenance Q2W per standard of care. Following the first nivo + ipi dose, patients were treated with conventionally fractionated RT (30 Gy in 10 fractions) to one melanoma metastasis. Treatment-related (TRAE) and treatment-emergent (TEAE, all causality) adverse events within the first 24 weeks of immunotherapy initiation were summarized overall and by CTCAE grade. Objective response rate (ORR) was assessed by RECIST 1.1 outside and within the irradiated fields. ORR rates were provided with binomial 95% confidence intervals (CI). Results: Ten patients (median age: 65 [range: 28-86] years; 6 female) received at least 1 dose of study therapy and were included in the safety analyses. One patient withdrew consent prior to efficacy assessment and was excluded from efficacy analyses. All patients had ≥1 any grade (G) TEAE. G3/4 TRAE occurred in 4 patients (40%), and G3/4 TEAE occurred in 7 patients (70%). G3/4 TRAE were anemia, thrombocytopenia, increased lipase, and pruritus. ORR outside of the irradiated field was 44% (4/9, 95% CI: 14-79%). Responses were also seen within the irradiated fields. Two patients died due to disease progression. Conclusions: This first prospective study in a small group of patients suggests it is safe to combine conventionally fractionated RT with nivo + ipi. Based on acceptable G3/4 TRAE in this fully accrued cohort testing conventionally fractionated RT, accrual is ongoing to a second cohort where patients receive higher dose per fraction RT with nivo + ipi. Clinical trial information: NCT02659540

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2018 ASCO Annual Meeting

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Melanoma/Skin Cancers

Track

Melanoma/Skin Cancers

Sub Track

Advanced/Metastatic Disease

Clinical Trial Registration Number

NCT02659540

Citation

J Clin Oncol 36, 2018 (suppl; abstr 9550)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2018.36.15_suppl.9550

Abstract #

9550

Poster Bd #

377

Abstract Disclosures