The impact of prostate cancer (PC) margin extent (ME) at radical prostatectomy (RP) on biochemical relapse-free survival (bRFS).

Authors

null

Steven Neema Seyedin

University of Iowa Hospital and Clinics, Iowa City, IA

Steven Neema Seyedin , Sarah L Mott , Anthony N Snow , James Kyle Russo , John Watkins

Organizations

University of Iowa Hospital and Clinics, Iowa City, IA, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Holden Comprehensive Cancer Center, Iowa City, IA, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, IA, Bismarck Cancer Center, Bismarck, ND

Research Funding

Other

Background: Surgical margin involvement (M+) by PC at RP is associated with suboptimal bRFS; however, the interaction of M+ with coincident high-risk clinicopathologic and treatment factors obscures accurate estimation of recurrence risk. The objective of this study is to determine whether ME permits risk stratification. Methods: Retrospective analysis of clinicopathologic factor association with bRFS. Eligible patients underwent RP alone for clinically localized PC. Patients with metastatic disease, PSA > 30 at diagnosis, pathologic involvement of seminal vesicles or lymph nodes at RP, insufficient follow-up, or receipt of pre-RP or adjuvant therapy were excluded. Slides from RP specimens with close or positive margins were re-reviewed by study pathologists blinded to outcome. Results: From 2002-2010, 667 patients were eligible for analysis. The median age was 61 yrs (range, 43-76), and all had cT1-2 disease (83% T1c), with median PSA 5.6 (0.9-28.0; 85% ≤10). Robot-assisted RP was employed in 141 cases (21%). Two hundred ten patients (31%) had M+, with single maximal ME 3mm (0.1-23), and cumulative ME 4mm (0.1-34). At median follow-up of 102 months (13-184), 149 patients (22%) had recurrence, with estimated 8-year bRFS rates of 85%/56% for M-/+ patients (p < 0.01). Multivariable analysis identified PSA, Gleason score (GS), extraprostatic extension, and M+ as associated with bRFS. Specific to patients with involved margins, the combination of ME and GS permitted recurrence risk stratification, with a low-risk subset identified (GS≤6 and ME < 3mm; Table). Conclusions: The current investigation suggests that GS6 patients with maximal or cumulative ME < 3mm appear to have favorable early 8-year bRFS following RP. GS6 patients with wider ME and GS ≥7 with any extent M+ appear to have suboptimal bRFS. RP pathology reports should include ME details, in order to more precisely estimate risk of subsequent disease recurrence.

Gleason Score (RP)nSingle Max ME
(mm)
8-Year bRFS
(95% CI)
nCumulative ME
(mm)
8-Year bRFS
(95% CI)
≤653< 386%
(67-95%)
27< 392%
(72-98%)
23≥371%
(55-82%)
49≥368%
(52-79%)
775< 652%
(38-64%)
80< 951%
(38-63%)
30≥635%
(18-53%)
25≥932%
(14-52%)
≥817Any0%
(0%)
17Any0%
(0%)

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2018 Genitourinary Cancers Symposium

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Poster Session A: Prostate Cancer

Track

Prostate Cancer,Prostate Cancer

Sub Track

Prostate Cancer - Localized Disease

Citation

J Clin Oncol 36, 2018 (suppl 6S; abstr 83)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2018.36.6_suppl.83

Abstract #

83

Poster Bd #

E3

Abstract Disclosures

Similar Abstracts

First Author: Masashi Kato

First Author: Magdalena Fay

First Author: Ahmed Bilal Khalid