A closer look at extraprostatic extension (EPE): Evaluation of PSA relapse rates following prostatectomy (RP) for pT3aN0 prostate cancer with or without margin involvement.

Authors

null

John Morgan Watkins

Bismarck Cancer Center, Bismarck, ND

John Morgan Watkins , Patricia L. Watkins , Michael Laszewski , Mark Rodacker , Tarek A. Dufan , Nadim Koleilat

Organizations

Bismarck Cancer Center, Bismarck, ND, St. Alexius Hospital, Bismarck, ND, Sanford Bismarck Health System, Bismarck, ND

Research Funding

No funding sources reported

Background: EPE is an established risk factor for PSA failure following RP; however, often this is identified in the context of other high-risk feature(s). The objective of the current investigation study is to describe the PSA relapse rate for patients with confirmed EPE and identify associated factors for risk stratification. Methods: Retrospective analysis of patient- and tumor-specific factors. Eligible patients underwent RP for biopsy-proven prostate adenocarcinoma and pathologic finding of EPE. Patients with PSA >30 at diagnosis, involved seminal vesicles or lymph nodes at RP, or who received adjuvant therapy (hormone or radiation) were excluded. Results: Between 2002 and 2010, 644 patients underwent RP, of whom 95 had EPE and were eligible per above. The median age at diagnosis was 64 years (range 44-74), and pre-RP PSA 6.1 (1.8-25.4). At a median PSA follow-up of 64 months (range 13.3-136.5), 38 patients had experienced PSA relapse at a median of 18 months post-RP (1.2-129.8), of whom 28 had involved surgical margins. For the entire population, PSA relapse at 5 years was 39.2% (95% CI, 38.1-40.3%). Factors associated with PSA relapse included pre- and post-RP PSA and Gleason score (GS), and margin status. Subset evaluation by RP Gleason score and margin status is demonstrated in the table. Conclusions: Within the present study, all patients with EPE appear to have elevated rates of PSA relapse within 5 years of RP. Longer follow-up is necessary to determine whether the low-risk group may be safely observed following margin-negative RP. Low-grade EPE cases with involved margin and/or higher-risk Gleason score patients with any EPE/margin involvement have high rates of early PSA relapse, and should be recommended early post-operative (adjuvant) therapy in order to optimize PSA control.

Gleason score (at RP) Margin 5y failure
(95% CI)
Gleason 6 0%
(-)
+ 33.3%
(27.8-38.8%)
Gleason 7 28.1%
(23.2-33.0%)
+ 50.4%
(46.4-54.4%)
Gleason 8-9 62.5%
(48.2-76.8%)
+ 71.4%
(55.6-87.2%)

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2014 Genitourinary Cancers Symposium

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

General Poster Session B: Prostate, Penile, Urethral, and Testicular Cancers, and Urothelial Carcinoma

Track

Urothelial Carcinoma,Prostate Cancer,Penile, Urethral, and Testicular Cancers

Sub Track

Prostate Cancer

Citation

J Clin Oncol 32, 2014 (suppl 4; abstr 215)

DOI

10.1200/jco.2014.32.4_suppl.215

Abstract #

215

Poster Bd #

B11

Abstract Disclosures

Similar Abstracts

First Author: Masashi Kato

First Author: Steven Neema Seyedin

First Author: Ahmed Bilal Khalid