Phase II study of sequential first-line pazopanib (PAZ) followed by everolimus (EVE) in patients (pts) with advanced or metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC) (CATChEz Study).

Authors

null

Paul L. de Souza

University of Western Sydney School of Medicine, Sydney, Australia

Paul L. de Souza , Shirley Wong , Sanjeev Sewak , Dusan Kotasek , Bhumsuk Keam , Jinsoo Chung , Noelle Erbeck , Jackie Han , Luca Dezzani , Qasim Ahmad , Paul N. Mainwaring

Organizations

University of Western Sydney School of Medicine, Sydney, Australia, Western Health, Footscray, Australia, Peninsula and Southeast Oncology, Frankston, Australia, Adelaide Cancer Centre, Kurralta Park, Australia, Seoul National University Cancer Research Institute, Seoul, Korea, Republic of (South), National Cancer Center, Goyang-Si, Korea South, Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, East Hanover, NJ, Centre for Personalized Nanomedicine, Australian Institute for Bioengineering and Nanotechnology, University of Queensland, South Brisbane, Australia

Research Funding

Pharmaceutical/Biotech Company

Background: EVE following failure of sorafenib or sunitinib for RCC was first approved by the FDA in 2009. CATChEz (NCT01545817) was designed to test the activity of EVE following first-line PAZ in pts with advanced or metastatic RCC who had not received prior systemic therapy. Methods: From 2012 to 2016, pts received first-line PAZ followed by EVE until progressive disease (PD), death, unacceptable toxicity, consent withdrawal, or study termination. Pts with PD during or within 6 months of stopping PAZ were eligible for EVE. Pts off study treatment were evaluated for PD, survival, and updates on anticancer treatment every 8 weeks until death or end of study. The primary efficacy endpoint was median progression-free survival (mPFS) for the second-line EVE treatment period; secondary endpoints included other survival measures, and safety evaluations were for second-line EVE and grade 3/4 toxicities attributable to PAZ and EVE. Results: Of 74 pts who started first-line PAZ, 38 received ≥1 dose of second-line EVE. The primary endpoint of mPFS from the start of second-line EVE and the secondary endpoint of mPFS with first-line PAZ (Table) were consistent with previous reports; no unexpected adverse events (AEs) were reported. All pts had ≥1 treatment-emergent AE, 83.8% had grade ≥3 AEs, and 71.6% had serious AEs. Of 34 total deaths, 29 were due to PD and 5 were due to AEs (2 related to EVE [lower respiratory tract infection; pulmonary sepsis]; 3 unrelated to study treatment). Conclusions: Efficacy and safety outcomes were consistent with published phase III data. The CATChEz study supports sequential first-line use of PAZ followed by EVE for the treatment of pts with advanced or metastatic RCC. Clinical trial information: NCT01545817

Primary efficacy endpoint
mPFS from the start of EVE, ITT population (N = 38)
months (95% CI)5.1 (3.4, 6.8)
Secondary efficacy endpoints
mOS with EVE, ITT population (N = 38)
months (95% CI)15.6 (9.9, 25.3)
mOS from start of study treatment, ATS population (N = 74)
months (95% CI)35.7 (26.7, NE)
mPFS from start of PAZ, ATS population (N = 74)
months (95% CI)11.0 (7.2, 14.8)

ATS, all treated subjects; CI, confidence interval; ITT, intent to treat; mOS, median overall survival.

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2018 Genitourinary Cancers Symposium

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Poster Session C: Renal Cell Cancer

Track

Renal Cell Cancer

Sub Track

Renal Cell Cancer

Clinical Trial Registration Number

NCT01545817

Citation

J Clin Oncol 36, 2018 (suppl 6S; abstr 648)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2018.36.6_suppl.648

Abstract #

648

Poster Bd #

H19

Abstract Disclosures