School of Public Health and Preventative Medicine, Monash University, and Alfred Health, Melbourne, Australia
John Raymond Zalcberg , Robin Lewis Jones , Jean-Yves Blay , Suzanne George , Hans Gelderblom , Patrick Schöffski , Margaret von Mehren , Yoon-Koo Kang , Albiruni Ryan Abdul Razak , Jonathan C. Trent , Steven Attia , Axel Le Cesne , Erika Davis , Haroun Achour , Matthew L. Sherman , Rodrigo Ruiz-Soto , Sebastian Bauer , Michael C. Heinrich
Background: Ripretinib is a switch-control tyrosine kinase inhibitor approved for patients (pts) with gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) who received prior treatment with 3 or more kinase inhibitors, including imatinib. Sunitinib is approved for advanced GIST after imatinib failure. In the second interim analysis of overall survival (OS) from the phase 3 INTRIGUE study, the OS event rate was 41% in the all-patient (AP) intent-to-treat (ITT) population, and OS was similar between treatment arms in both the KIT exon 11 ITT and AP ITT populations. Here, we present the final OS and updated safety from INTRIGUE. Methods: INTRIGUE (NCT03673501) is an open-label, phase 3 study of adults with advanced GIST who had disease progression on or intolerance to imatinib. Randomization was 1:1 to ripretinib 150 mg once daily (QD) or sunitinib 50 mg QD (4 weeks on/2 weeks off) and was stratified by KIT mutational status and imatinib intolerance. OS was a key secondary endpoint (the primary endpoint of progression-free survival was reported previously); final OS analysis was prespecified to occur with ≥200 and ≥145 events in the AP ITT and KIT exon 11 ITT populations, respectively. Data cutoff was March 15, 2023. Results: Of 453 pts, 444 received treatment; 40 remain on treatment (ripretinib, 28/223 [13%]; sunitinib, 12/221 [5%]). Treatment discontinuation was due to progressive disease (PD) by independent radiologic review (56%), PD by investigator (11%), clinical PD (6%), withdrawal of consent (6%), and adverse events (AEs; 5%). Fewer pts discontinued treatment due to AEs with ripretinib vs sunitinib (3% vs 6%). There were 211 OS events (47%) in the AP ITT population and 151 OS events (46%) in the KIT exon 11 ITT population. OS was similar with ripretinib vs sunitinib in the 2 ITT populations (Table). Fewer pts had grade 3/4 treatment-emergent AEs with ripretinib vs sunitinib (43% vs 67%). Dose interruptions and reductions were lower with ripretinib vs sunitinib. Median treatment duration for ripretinib vs sunitinib was 7.9 vs 6.5 months. Conclusions: In the finalOS analysis from the INTRIGUE study, OS was similar between treatment arms. The safety profile remained consistent and more favorable for ripretinib vs sunitinib in pts with advanced GIST previously treated with imatinib. Clinical trial information: NCT03673501.
AP ITT N = 453 Ripretinib vs Sunitinib | KIT Exon 11 ITT N = 327 Ripretinib vs Sunitinib | |
---|---|---|
Events, number | 102 vs 109 | 75 vs 76 |
mOS, months HR (95% CI) | 35.5 vs 31.5, 0.86 (0.65 to 1.13) | 35.5 vs 32.8, 0.98 (0.71 to 1.34) |
OS rate, % | ||
1 year | 85.4 vs 85.1 | 85.0 vs 88.4 |
2 years | 64.1 vs 62.5 | 63.9 vs 66.8 |
3 years | 48.5 vs 44.4 | 48.5 vs 47.4 |
Data cutoff: March 15, 2023.
CI, confidence interval; HR, hazard ratio; m, median.
Disclaimer
This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org
Abstract Disclosures