Overall survival and long-term safety with ripretinib vs sunitinib in patients with advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumor previously treated with imatinib: Final analyses from INTRIGUE.

Authors

null

John Raymond Zalcberg

School of Public Health and Preventative Medicine, Monash University, and Alfred Health, Melbourne, Australia

John Raymond Zalcberg , Robin Lewis Jones , Jean-Yves Blay , Suzanne George , Hans Gelderblom , Patrick Schöffski , Margaret von Mehren , Yoon-Koo Kang , Albiruni Ryan Abdul Razak , Jonathan C. Trent , Steven Attia , Axel Le Cesne , Erika Davis , Haroun Achour , Matthew L. Sherman , Rodrigo Ruiz-Soto , Sebastian Bauer , Michael C. Heinrich

Organizations

School of Public Health and Preventative Medicine, Monash University, and Alfred Health, Melbourne, Australia, Sarcoma Unit, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust and Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom, Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands, University Hospitals Leuven, Department of General Medical Oncology, Leuven Cancer Institute, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan, Seoul, South Korea, Toronto Sarcoma Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Center, Toronto, ON, Canada, Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Miami Health System, Miami, FL, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France, Deciphera Pharmaceuticals, LLC, Waltham, MA, Department of Medical Oncology, Sarcoma Center/West German Cancer Center, University Hospital Essen, University Duisburg-Essen and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany, Portland VA Health Care System and OHSU Knight Cancer Institute, Portland, OR

Research Funding

Deciphera Pharmaceuticals, LLC

Background: Ripretinib is a switch-control tyrosine kinase inhibitor approved for patients (pts) with gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) who received prior treatment with 3 or more kinase inhibitors, including imatinib. Sunitinib is approved for advanced GIST after imatinib failure. In the second interim analysis of overall survival (OS) from the phase 3 INTRIGUE study, the OS event rate was 41% in the all-patient (AP) intent-to-treat (ITT) population, and OS was similar between treatment arms in both the KIT exon 11 ITT and AP ITT populations. Here, we present the final OS and updated safety from INTRIGUE. Methods: INTRIGUE (NCT03673501) is an open-label, phase 3 study of adults with advanced GIST who had disease progression on or intolerance to imatinib. Randomization was 1:1 to ripretinib 150 mg once daily (QD) or sunitinib 50 mg QD (4 weeks on/2 weeks off) and was stratified by KIT mutational status and imatinib intolerance. OS was a key secondary endpoint (the primary endpoint of progression-free survival was reported previously); final OS analysis was prespecified to occur with ≥200 and ≥145 events in the AP ITT and KIT exon 11 ITT populations, respectively. Data cutoff was March 15, 2023. Results: Of 453 pts, 444 received treatment; 40 remain on treatment (ripretinib, 28/223 [13%]; sunitinib, 12/221 [5%]). Treatment discontinuation was due to progressive disease (PD) by independent radiologic review (56%), PD by investigator (11%), clinical PD (6%), withdrawal of consent (6%), and adverse events (AEs; 5%). Fewer pts discontinued treatment due to AEs with ripretinib vs sunitinib (3% vs 6%). There were 211 OS events (47%) in the AP ITT population and 151 OS events (46%) in the KIT exon 11 ITT population. OS was similar with ripretinib vs sunitinib in the 2 ITT populations (Table). Fewer pts had grade 3/4 treatment-emergent AEs with ripretinib vs sunitinib (43% vs 67%). Dose interruptions and reductions were lower with ripretinib vs sunitinib. Median treatment duration for ripretinib vs sunitinib was 7.9 vs 6.5 months. Conclusions: In the finalOS analysis from the INTRIGUE study, OS was similar between treatment arms. The safety profile remained consistent and more favorable for ripretinib vs sunitinib in pts with advanced GIST previously treated with imatinib. Clinical trial information: NCT03673501.

Final OS analysis.

AP ITT
N = 453
Ripretinib vs Sunitinib
KIT Exon 11 ITT
N = 327
Ripretinib vs Sunitinib
Events, number102 vs 10975 vs 76
mOS, months
HR (95% CI)
35.5 vs 31.5,
0.86 (0.65 to 1.13)
35.5 vs 32.8,
0.98 (0.71 to 1.34)
OS rate, %
1 year85.4 vs 85.185.0 vs 88.4
2 years64.1 vs 62.563.9 vs 66.8
3 years48.5 vs 44.448.5 vs 47.4

Data cutoff: March 15, 2023.

CI, confidence interval; HR, hazard ratio; m, median.

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2024 ASCO Gastrointestinal Cancers Symposium

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Poster Session A: Cancers of the Esophagus and Stomach and Other Gastrointestinal Cancers

Track

Esophageal and Gastric Cancer,Other GI Cancer

Sub Track

Therapeutics

Clinical Trial Registration Number

NCT03673501

Citation

J Clin Oncol 42, 2024 (suppl 3; abstr 748)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2024.42.3_suppl.748

Abstract #

748

Poster Bd #

M3

Abstract Disclosures