Treatment modification with sunitinib in first-line (1L) metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC): An analysis of the STAR-TOR registry.

Authors

null

Martin Boegemann

University of Muenster Medical Center, Münster, Germany

Martin Boegemann , Marcus Hubbe , Despina Thomaidou , Stuart Blackburn , Nawal Bent-Ennakhil , Robert Wood , Danielle Bargo

Organizations

University of Muenster Medical Center, Münster, Germany, Pfizer Pharma GmbH, Berlin, Germany, Pfizer Hellas, Athens, Greece, Adelphi Real World, Bollington, United Kingdom, Pfizer, Inc., New York City, NY

Research Funding

Pharmaceutical/Biotech Company

Background: The standard dosing schedule for administration of Sunitinib is 50mg once daily for a 4-week period followed by 2 weeks off. However, in clinical practice, many patients require schedule or dose reductions to mitigate toxicity. We aimed to assess if these treatment modifications result in improved outcomes in mRCC patients. Methods: Data were drawn from STAR-TOR, a German, multi-centre, real-world, prospective registry to report outcomes of mRCC patients who received Sunitinib in 1L. Patients were categorised into 2 treatment groups: 1) Sunitinib initiated at standard schedule/dose with subsequent schedule/dose modification (SM), 2) Sunitinib as per standard schedule/dosage (SS). Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was used to determine time on treatment (TT) of Sunitinib and progression-free survival (PFS). Differences between groups were assessed using log-rank tests. Results: In total 297 patients were identified initiating 1L Sunitinib. Schedule or dose reductions occurred in 33% of patients. Significant differences between groups at baseline are noted in Table 1. Median TT was greater in SM vs. SS (15.1 vs. 3.9 months (m), p < 0.0001). Median PFS was improved in SM vs. SS (15.1 vs. 6.0 m, p < 0.0001). Fatigue (31/14%), hand-foot syndrome (HFS) (28/10%), diarrhea (35/19%) and stomatitis (20/6%) were more frequently reported in SM vs. SS since initiation of Sunitinib. Incidence of adverse events, (excluding diarrhea) was reduced following schedule/ dose modification of sunitinib; fatigue (before SM/ after SM) (18/7%), HFS (21/8%) and stomatitis (8/4%). Conclusions: Modifying Sunitinib schedule or individualizing the dose represent therapy management strategies that are associated with improved tolerability, prolonged treatment duration and significant improvement in PFS in a real life setting. These data suggest that effective management of toxicity of Sunitinib can optimize patient outcomes.

Baseline characteristicsOverallSSSM
N29719998
Median age (IQR)66 (59-74)65 (58-74)69 (62-74)*
Karnofsky Performance Status ≥80%238 (81.5)154 (78.2)84 (88.4)*
Median PFS (m)10.16.015.1**

Vs SS: *p < 0.05; **p < 0.0001

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2018 Genitourinary Cancers Symposium

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Poster Session C: Renal Cell Cancer

Track

Renal Cell Cancer

Sub Track

Renal Cell Cancer

Citation

J Clin Oncol 36, 2018 (suppl 6S; abstr 602)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2018.36.6_suppl.602

Abstract #

602

Poster Bd #

F17

Abstract Disclosures

Similar Abstracts