Improved survival rates in kidney cancer patients with brain metastases treated with modern multidisciplinary approaches.

Authors

I. Alex Bowman

I. Alex Bowman

UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX

I. Alex Bowman , Alisha Bent , Tri Le , Alana Christie , Zabi Wardak , Bruce Mickey , Robert D. Timmerman , Raquibul Hannan , James Brugarolas

Organizations

UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX

Research Funding

NIH

Background: Brain metastases (BM) in RCC have been associated with poor overall survival. Systemic targeted and immunotherapy and the increasing use of stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is likely to improve outcomes. Methods: A retrospective database of mRCC patients treated at our institution between 2006 and 2015 was compiled and patients with BM identified. Overall survival (OS) was analyzed by the Kaplan-Meier method. BM patients were compared to non-BM patients after adjusting for the timing of BM diagnosis, either prior to or during 1st line systemic therapy (ST). Results: 56 of 248 mRCC patients (22.6%) were diagnosed with BM, 35 (62.5%) prior to and 21 (37.5%) during 1st line ST. 43/56 (77%) received definitive local therapy for BM (surgery 10, SRS 26, or both 7). 9 received WBRT only and 4 had no CNS-directed therapy. All patients received ST. The median OS for ST-naïve BM patients compared with non-BM patients was 19.5 vs. 28.7 months (p = 0.012). Survival for patients developing BM on 1st-line therapy was not significantly different from patients without BM progressing on 1st line ST (11.8 vs. 17.8 months, p = 0.66). BM patients with poor risk mRCC by IMDC criteria did worse than those without BM regardless of line of therapy. Conclusions: Survival for patients with BM and favorable or intermediate risk mRCC is significantly better than historical reports and similar to non-BM patients in our population which was heavily treated with both systemic and local therapies. Patients with BM and poor risk RCC had significantly worse survival, suggesting that risk group should be considered when counseling on prognosis and selecting treatment.

Median OS by presence of brain metastases and prior therapy (mo.)

BM presentBM absentp
No prior therapy (n = 35/192)19.5 (6.3-29.0)28.7 (22.0-39.7)0.012
    

Favorable risk (n = 4/28)

NRNR0.024
    

Intermediate risk (n = 18/86)

29.0 (11.4-58.7)36.7 (19.4-44.4)0.525
    

Poor risk (n = 12/42)

3.5 (2.6-6.3)9.4 (4.6-13.6)0.046
1 prior therapy (n = 21/166)11.8 (2.9-87.3)17.8 (11.7-24.4)0.666
    

Favorable risk (n = 6/25)

NR56.9 (26.6-*)0.258
    

Intermediate risk (n = 8/74)

10.9 (1.5-87.3)22.3 (10.6-35.5)0.308
    

Poor risk (n = 3/37)

1.1 (0.1-*)5.0 (2.4-8.5)0.055

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2018 Genitourinary Cancers Symposium

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Poster Session C: Renal Cell Cancer

Track

Renal Cell Cancer

Sub Track

Renal Cell Cancer

Citation

J Clin Oncol 36, 2018 (suppl 6S; abstr 601)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2018.36.6_suppl.601

Abstract #

601

Poster Bd #

F16

Abstract Disclosures

Similar Abstracts

First Author: Vivek Podder

First Author: Abiola Fatimilehin

First Author: Abhenil Mittal