Comparison of digital PCR with real-time PCR calibrated to the International Scale for BCR-ABL monitoring.

Authors

null

Parth Shah

Lahey Hospital and Medical Center, Burlington, MA

Parth Shah , Furha Iram Cossor , Shiva Murarka , Hemangi Dixit

Organizations

Lahey Hospital and Medical Center, Burlington, MA, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA, Supratech Micropath Laboratories and Research Institute, Ahmedabad, India

Research Funding

Other

Background: Monitoring BCR-ABL1 fusion transcripts is the cornerstone of management in chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). Real Time PCR(RTPCR) has been the tool of choice for its sensitivity and dynamic range. The International Scale was recently introduced to allow for standardization across laboratories. Chip based Digital PCR(dPCR) which allows for absolute quantitation may obliviate the need for such standardization by giving absolute results.It has the potential to increase sensitivity for detection of minimal residual disease. This assumes great significance as we move into the era of treatment free remission. Methods: A total of 31 EDTA-blood samples of CML patients with known values ranging from 0.003-0.5 IS were processed via an accredited RTPCR protocol calibrated to the IS scale and a parallel dPCR workflow without any specific calibration . The analysis of digital PCR samples was performed on the Thermofisher Cloud Platform. Results: Both RTPCR and dPCR yielded extremely concordant results. The Pearson correlation between the two methods was r = 0.6043 (95%CI: 0.318 to 0.789; p = 0.0003). The calculated BCR-ABL/ABL ratios were comparable with a median of 0.098 for RT-PCR calibrated to the IS (range 0.003-0.55; n = 26) and 0.11 for dPCR (range 0.003-0.37; n = 29). The mean difference for the ratios between the two methods used for the detection was around 0.08. Conclusions: We demonstrate here the capability of dPCR to provide a parallel result to an IS scale calibrated protocol without any standardization. This approach required no specific calibrators or standards and resulted in extremely cost effective testing. This freedom from routine calibration provides for a significantly more robust workflow and greatly increased reliability. Limitations do persist in dPCR on account of limited chip densities which are the main parameter for the Poisson statistics. This has limited the dynamic range on dPCR to a maximum of Log 4 for accurate quantification. However as chip densities and emulsion concentrations increase in these technologies, they are poised to introduce a new era in the quest of accurate quantification.

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2017 ASCO Annual Meeting

Session Type

Publication Only

Session Title

Publication Only: Hematologic Malignancies—Leukemia, Myelodysplastic Syndromes, and Allotransplant

Track

Hematologic Malignancies—Leukemia, Myelodysplastic Syndromes, and Allotransplant

Sub Track

Chronic Leukemia—CML

Citation

J Clin Oncol 35, 2017 (suppl; abstr e18545)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2017.35.15_suppl.e18545

Abstract #

e18545

Abstract Disclosures