The accuracy of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) using PI-RADS v2 in disease upgrading on re-biopsy among patients with low-risk prostate cancer (PCa) on active surveillance (AS): A Brazilian perspective.

Authors

null

Públio C. C. Viana

Instituto do Câncer do Estado de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil

Públio C. C. Viana , Natally Horvat , Giuliano Guglielmetti , Rafael Coelho , William Carlos Nahas , Rubens Park , Regis Bezerra , Diogo Assed Bastos , Thiana Rodrigues , Hebert Alberto Vargas

Organizations

Instituto do Câncer do Estado de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, Sao Paulo State Cancer Institute - University of Sao Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil, Sao Paulo Cancer Institute ICESP - University of Sao Paulo FMUSP, São Paulo, Brazil, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil, Instituto do Cancer do Estado de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil, Hospital Sírio-Libanês, São Paulo, Brazil

Research Funding

Other

Background: The current selection criteria to AS is critical and it becomes even more relevant in Latin America, given the higher proportion of high risk cancers. The objective of this study is to analyze the accuracy of mpMRI using PI-RADS v2 in predicting the risk of upgrading on re-biopsy (UR) in men with low-risk PCa on AS. Methods: In this Institutional Review Board approved prospective study, patients with low-grade PCa selected for AS at our institution underwent mpMRI at least 6 weeks after the baseline 12-core random prostate biopsy (BSB), from March 2014 to March 2016. One blinded abdominal radiologist evaluated the exams regarding presence of dominant lesion and assigned the PI-RADS v2 score. MRI-target transrectal ultrasound-guided re-biopsies were performed in all patients within 6-12 months after the BSB. Standardized 12-core biopsy was performed and additional cores were taken from suspicious areas on mpMRI. Results: One hundred and nine patients were included, 93 (85.3%) patients had a dominant lesion on MRI. mpMRI were classified as PI-RADS 1, 2 or 3 in 67 (61.5%) patients, and as PI-RADS 4 or 5 in 42 (38.5%) patients. UR occurred in 42 (38.5%) patients. Out of these, 39 (92.8%) had radical prostatectomy, 6 (15.4%) T2a, 24 (61.5%) T2b, and 9 (23.1%) T3a. The diagnostic performance of mpMRI for PCa upgrading after re-biopsy was summarized in table 1. Patients assigned as PI-RADS 4 or 5 presented a significantly higher risk for UR compared with patients with PI-RADS 1, 2 or 3 (73.8% vs 16.4%, p < 0.001). Logistic regression analyses demonstrated that PI-RADS 4 or 5 remained a significant predictor of UR (OR: 37.366, p < 0.0001). Conclusions: We demonstrated in our population that mpMRI using PI-RADS v2 is a significant predictor for upgrading on re-biopsy in patients on AS and could be used to guide TRUS biopsy, increasing the accuracy of current clinical criteria for AS.

Sensitivity0.761 (0.612; 0.874)
Specificity0.889 (0.784; 0.954)
Positive predictive value0.833 (0.686; 0.930)
Negative predictive value0.836 (0.725; 0.915)
Accuracy0.835 (0.752; 0.899)

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2017 ASCO Annual Meeting

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Genitourinary (Prostate) Cancer

Track

Genitourinary Cancer—Prostate, Testicular, and Penile

Sub Track

Prostate Cancer–Local-Regional Disease

Citation

J Clin Oncol 35, 2017 (suppl; abstr 5084)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2017.35.15_suppl.5084

Abstract #

5084

Poster Bd #

158

Abstract Disclosures

Similar Abstracts

First Author: Thorgerdur Palsdottir

First Author: Juan Javier-Desloges

Abstract

2022 ASCO Genitourinary Cancers Symposium

Disease progression and competing mortality for men undergoing active surveillance for low-risk prostate cancer.

First Author: Kripa Guram

Abstract

2024 ASCO Genitourinary Cancers Symposium

Contemporary diagnosis of very low risk prostate cancer in a multi-centered hospital system.

First Author: Richard Bennett IV