Davidoff Cancer Center, Tel Aviv, Israel
Salomon M. Stemmer , Mariana Steiner , Shulamith Rizel , Noa Ben Baruch , Lior Soussan-Gutman , Avital Bareket-Samish , Bella Nisenbaum , Kevin Isaacs , Georgeta Fried , Ora Rosengarten , Tamar Peretz , Christer Svedman , Debbie McCullough , Shmuel Klang , Jamal Zidan , Larisa Ryvo , Bella Kaufman , Steven Shak , Nicky Liebermann , David B Geffen
Background: Elderly BC pts are generally undertreated, despite evidence suggesting that they may benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy (CT). We compared treatments/clinical outcomes in elderly vs younger Clalit Health Services (CHS) pts undergoing RS testing. Methods: This exploratory analysis of the CHS registry included BC pts with N0/N1mi/N1 disease who were RS-tested from 1/2006 (CHS approval of the test) through 12/2010 (N0) or 12/2011 (N1mi/N1). Medical records were reviewed to verify treatments/recurrences/survival. Results: The analysis included 458 elderly and 2052 younger pts, with a median (range) follow-up of 5.7 (0.9-9.6) and 6.1 (0.1-10.3) yrs, respectively. In the elderly/younger pts, median age was 73/58 yrs, 48%/52% had grade 2 tumors, median tumor size was 1.6/1.5 cm, 70%/72% were N0 and 30%/28% were N1mi/N1. RS distribution (<18, 18-30, ≥31) among elderly pts was 56%, 33%, and 11%, respectively, compared to 49%, 41%, and 10%, respectively, in younger pts. In pts with RS 18-30 and RS≥31, CT use was significantly lower in the elderly (P<.001). Kaplan-Meier estimates for 5-yr distant recurrence and BC death risk are presented (Table). Conclusions: In elderly pts, the proportion of those with RS≥31 was very similar to younger pts; however, overall CT use was significantly lower. Within each RS group, there was no statistically significant difference in clinical outcomes between the age groups; though, numerically, in RS 18-30 pts, outcomes were worse in the elderly. In pts with RS<18, outcomes were excellent regardless of age and despite very low rates of CT use.
Age | RS<18 | RS: 18-30 | RS≥31 | P* | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
N | CT use, % | 5-yr distant recurrence risk (95% CI)/ | N | CT use, % | 5-yr distant recurrence risk (95% CI)/ | N | CT use, % | 5-yr distant recurrence risk (95% CI)/ | ||
5-yr BC death risk (95% CI) | 5-yr BC death risk (95% CI) | 5-yr BC death risk (95% CI) | ||||||||
<70 | 1001 | 3 | 1.4 (0.8-2.4) 0.1 (0.0-0.7) | 841 | 31 | 3.5 (2.4-5.0) 1.2 (0.6-2.2) | 210 | 91 | 11.6 (8.0-16.9) 6.5 (3.8-10.9) | <.001 <.001 |
≥70 | 258 | 2 | 2.0 (0.8-4.7) 0.4 (0.1-2.8) | 150 | 11 | 6.0 (3.2-11.3) 3.5 (1.5-8.3) | 50 | 68 | 8.0 (3.1-19.9) 4.2 (1.1-15.6) | .006 <.001 |
* Distant recurrence risk/BC death across RS groups were compared using log-rank test.
Disclaimer
This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org
Abstract Disclosures
2023 ASCO Annual Meeting
First Author: Charles Geyer
2017 ASCO Annual Meeting
First Author: Salomon M. Stemmer
2023 ASCO Annual Meeting
First Author: Mafalda Oliveira
2023 ASCO Annual Meeting
First Author: Ann Collier