Racial composition in trials supporting the U.S. approval of anti-cancer new molecular entities (NMEs): 2011- 2016.

Authors

null

Lola A. Fashoyin-Aje

U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD

Lola A. Fashoyin-Aje , Laura L. Fernandes , Steven Lemery , Patricia Keegan , Rajeshwari Sridhara , Jonca C. Bull , Richard Pazdur

Organizations

U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD

Research Funding

Other

Background: In New Drug- and Biologics License Applications, clinical trials provide the primary safety and efficacy data upon which approval decisions are made. Low numbers of patients from racial groups that experience higher incidence and/or mortality from some cancers compared to the overall US population, may limit the generalizability of trial results. The Census estimates that the US population is 77.1%White, 13.3% Black/ African American (AA), 5.6% Asian, 1.2% American Indian/ Alaska Native (AIAN), and 0.2% Native Hawaiian/ Other Pacific Islander (NHPI). FDA conducted an analysis to compare the racial composition in trials supporting the approval of NMEs for the treatment of solid tumor malignancies. Methods: We reviewed the marketing applications of the 33 NMEs approved between 2011- 2016 to identify trials that provided the primary evidence of safety and efficacy. Results: A total of 29941 patients were enrolled. The table below illustrates enrollment by race (excluding Non-Hispanic, Hispanic, Other, Mixed Race & Missing) and approval year. Conclusions: The proportion of White patients enrolled in the US (88%) is higher than the proportion of Whites in the US population. However, the enrollment of AA and NHPI/AIAN patients is low and below the proportional representation of AA and NHPI/AIAN in the US. While enrollment targets may differ across cancer type and by race, the racial composition of patients enrolled in the trials that support the approval of cancer therapeutics should be reflective of the likely US patient population for whom these agents will be prescribed. The majority of Asian patients enrolled were from RoW while the majority of AA and NHPI/AIAN patients were enrolled from the US. Increasing the representation of racial minority patients in oncology trials will require targeted recruitment and enrollment of these patients in US sites.

2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
Total
RoWUSRoWUSRoWUSRoWUSRoWUSRoWUSRoWUS
n373023474732160782057751059743328210488741539218828059
Asian,%319342814321683223
AA,%1316***2*916*5
Native,%****00***1****
White,%9593898651858493738078887288

RoW= Rest of the world; Native= NHPI/AIAN; *Less than 0.5%.

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2017 ASCO Annual Meeting

Session Type

Poster Discussion Session

Session Title

Health Services Research, Clinical Informatics, and Quality of Care

Track

Quality Care/Health Services Research

Sub Track

Access to Care

Citation

J Clin Oncol 35, 2017 (suppl; abstr 6518)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2017.35.15_suppl.6518

Abstract #

6518

Poster Bd #

340

Abstract Disclosures

Similar Abstracts