A randomized phase II study of ipilimumab at 3 (ipi3) or 10 mg/kg (ipi10) alone or in combination with high dose interferon-alfa (HDI) in advanced melanoma (E3611).

Authors

Ahmad Tarhini

Ahmad A. Tarhini

University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, Pittsburgh, PA

Ahmad A. Tarhini , Sandra J. Lee , Uma N. M. Rao , Arun Nagarajan , Mark R. Albertini , Jerry W Mitchell Jr., Stuart J. Wong , Mark A. Taylor , Noel Laudi , Phu Van Truong , Robert Martin Conry , John M. Kirkwood

Organizations

University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, Pittsburgh, PA, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute/Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, Charleston Area Medical Center, David Lee Cancer Center, Charleston, WV, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, Zangmeister Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, Summit Cancer Care, Savannah, GA, Humphrey Cancer Center, Forest Lake, MN, Cancer Center of Kansas, Wichita, KS, The Kirkland Clinic At Acton Road, Birmingham, AL, Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA

Research Funding

NIH

Background: Interferon-α (IFN) favors a Th1 shift in immunity. Combining CTLA4 blockade with IFN may downregulate CTLA4 suppressive elements. Prior data from a phase II of tremelimumab and HDI showed promising efficacy supporting the current study. Methods: E3611 had a 2x2 factorial design (A: ipi10 + HDI; B: ipi10; C: ipi3 + HDI; D: ipi3) to evaluate (i) no HDI vs. HDI (across ipi doses) and (ii) ipi3 vs. ipi10 (across HDI status). We hypothesized that median progression free survival (PFS) would improve from 3 to 6 months (mos) with HDI vs. no HDI and with ipi10 vs. ipi3. Based on the log-rank test for 80 patients (pts) these comparisons would have 82% power at 2-sided type I error of 0.10. Results: Median follow up 26.4 mos. PFS and overall survival (OS) (eligible and treated pts; N = 80: 18 III/M1a, 24 M1b, 38 M1c) are shown in Table 1. There were no significant differences in PFS or OS when evaluating HDI vs. no HDI or ipi10 vs. ipi3 (Table 1). Response (RECIST) among response evaluable pts (and 4 pts with early death) (N = 76) is shown in Table 1. Stable disease (SD) in 7 (A), 6 (B), 8 (C) and 6 (D). Adverse events (AEs) were consistent with the toxicity profiles of ipi and HDI and included 3 grade 5 AEs considered at least possibly related: 1 in A (suicide), 1 in B (lung infection and hemorrhage) and 1 in C (adult respiratory distress syndrome). One patient in B died of gastrointestinal bleed and cardiac arrest while on corticosteroids to treat temporal arteritis and vision loss. Conclusions: Within the limitations of the sample size, there were no significant differences in PFS with HDI vs. no HDI or ipi10 vs. ipi3. Response and PFS with ipi10 were superior to historical controls and similar to the combination. Correlative studies are ongoing. Clinical trial information: NCT01708941

PFS (top) and OS: Median (95% CI) months.

Ipi10Ipi3
HDIAC
8.0 (2.8, 20.1)5.7 (1.5, 11.1)
20.1 (5.1, -)20.2 (1.9, -)
No HDIBD
6.2 (2.7, 25.7)2.8 (2.6, 5.7)
19.6 (6.5, 31.4)24.7 (12.1, -)
RR
HDIAC
5/15 (33.3%)3/18 (16.7%)
No HDIBD
7/22 (31.8%)3/21 (14.3%)
HDI vs. no HDIPFS: 6.7 (5.1, 11.0) vs. 5.0 (2.7, 8.2)
OS: 20.1 (8.5, 33.6) vs. 23.5 (12.2, 35.6)
Ipi10 vs. Ipi3PFS: 6.5 (5.1, 13.5) vs. 4.1 (2.6, 7.5)
OS: 20.1 (10.4, 31.4) vs. 23.5 (11.7,35.7)

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2017 ASCO Annual Meeting

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Melanoma/Skin Cancers

Track

Melanoma/Skin Cancers

Sub Track

Advanced/Metastatic Disease

Clinical Trial Registration Number

NCT01708941

Citation

J Clin Oncol 35, 2017 (suppl; abstr 9542)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2017.35.15_suppl.9542

Abstract #

9542

Poster Bd #

150

Abstract Disclosures