Overall survival and updated progression-free survival results from a randomized phase 2 trial comparing the combination of olaparib and cediranib against olaparib alone in recurrent platinum-sensitive ovarian cancer.

Authors

null

Joyce F. Liu

Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA

Joyce F. Liu , William Thomas Barry , Michael J. Birrer , Jung-min Lee , Ronald J. Buckanovich , Gini F. Fleming , Bj Rimel , Mary K. Buss , Sreenivasa R. Nattam , Jean Hurteau , Weixiu Luo , Sarah Farooq , Christin Whalen , Elise C. Kohn , S. Percy Ivy , Ursula A. Matulonis

Organizations

Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, Women's Malignancies Branch, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, University of Chicago Pritzker School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Hollywood, CA, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, Fort Wayne Medical Oncology and Hematology, Fort Wayne, IN, Northshore University Health Systems, University of Chicago, Evanston, IL, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD, National Cancer Institute at the National Institutes of Health, Rockville, MD

Research Funding

NIH

Background: We previously reported that the combination of cediranib (ced) and olaparib (olap) improved progression-free survival (PFS) and overall response rates (ORR) in women with recurrent platinum-sensitive (plat-sens) high-grade serous (HGS) or BRCA-related ovarian cancer (OvCa) (NCT 01116648). We conducted an updated PFS and overall survival (OS) analysis. Methods: Patients (pts) across 9 centers were randomized 1:1 in this Ph 2 open label study to Olap (olap 400 mg capsules BID) or Ced/Olap (olap 200 mg capsules BID; ced 30 mg daily), stratified by BRCA status and prior anti-angiogenic therapy. Eligibility included pts with recurrent plat-sens HGS or BRCA-related OvCa. Pts had measurable disease by RECIST 1.1, PS 0 or 1, and the ability to take POs. No prior anti-angiogenics in the recurrent setting or prior PARP inhibitor was allowed. PFS was defined as time from randomization to radiographic progression or death. OS was defined as time from randomization to death. Results: Pts were enrolled from Oct 2011 to Jun 2013: 46 to Olap, 44 to Ced/Olap. 48 pts were known BRCA carriers (25 Olap; 23 Ced/Olap). As of Dec 21, 2016, 67 pts had a PFS event, and 52 pts had an OS event. Updated median PFS was 8.2 mos for Olap and 16.5 mos for Ced/Olap (HR 0.50, 95% CI 0.30-0.83, p=0.007). Median OS was 33.3 mos for Olap and 44.2 mos for Ced/Olap (HR 0.64, 95% CI 0.36-1.11, p=0.11). Within known germline BRCA mut carriers, updated PFS was 16.5 vs 16.4 mos (HR 0.75, p=0.42), and OS was 40.1 vs 44.2 mos (HR 0.79, p=0.55) for Olap and Ced/Olap, respectively. In pts without known germline BRCA mut, updated PFS was 5.7 vs 23.7 mos (HR 0.32, p=0.002), and OS was 23.0 vs 37.8 mos (HR 0.48, p=0.074). Conclusions: Updated PFS results consistently demonstrated that Ced/Olap significantly extended PFS compared to Olap in the overall population of women with plat-sens OvCa. In this Phase 2 study not powered to detect OS diferences, there was a trend towards OS improvement with Ced/Olap, particularly in pts without a known germline BRCA mutation. Results from ongoing studies of this oral combination in OvCa are of clinical interest. Clinical trial information: NCT 01116648.

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2017 ASCO Annual Meeting

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Gynecologic Cancer

Track

Gynecologic Cancer

Sub Track

Ovarian Cancer

Clinical Trial Registration Number

NCT 01116648

Citation

J Clin Oncol 35, 2017 (suppl; abstr 5535)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2017.35.15_suppl.5535

Abstract #

5535

Poster Bd #

357

Abstract Disclosures