Olaparib, a poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitor, in combination with pembrolizumab and carboplatin as first-line treatment of recurrent or metastatic head and neck squamous-cell carcinoma (RM-HNSCC): A single-arm, phase 2 trial.

Authors

null

Jared Cohen

Washington University Siteman Cancer Center, St. Louis, MO

Jared Cohen , Jessica C. Ley , Jingxia Liu , Emma Haselhorst , Peter John Oppelt , Douglas Adkins

Organizations

Washington University Siteman Cancer Center, St. Louis, MO, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO

Research Funding

Pharmaceutical/Biotech Company
Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC, a subsidiary of Merck & Co., In., Rahway, NJ, Joseph Sanchez Foundation

Background: The homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) phenotype is common in HNSCC and is due to mutation and promoter hypermethylation of DNA repair genes (BRCA1, BRCA2, ATR, ATM, and FANC) and PTEN. In pre-clinical models of HNSCC, HRD sensitizes tumor to PARP inhibition and to additive antitumor activity of PARP inhibition in combination with platinum agents. PARP inhibitors also activate the STING pathway and upregulate PD-L1 expression, resulting in synergistic antitumor activity when given with PD-1 inhibitors. Olaparib is a highly selective PARP inhibitor that has been safely combined with pembrolizumab and carboplatin. Methods: In this single-arm phase 2 trial, patients with RM-HNSCC, no prior therapy for RM disease, and adequate performance status and organ function received up to six 21-day cycles of olaparib (200 mg bid orally days 1-10), pembrolizumab (200 mg IV day 1), and carboplatin (AUC 5 IV day 1), followed by up to twenty-nine 21-day cycles of olaparib (oral 300 mg bid days 1-21) and pembrolizumab (200 mg day 1). Treatment continued until discontinuation criteria were met. The primary endpoint was objective response, assessed by an independent radiologist using iRECIST. The primary hypothesis was that this regimen would result in a higher objective response rate (ORR) than historically reported with 5-FU, pembrolizumab and a platinum agent in similar patients. A Simon optimal two-stage design tested the null hypothesis (H0 : ORR≤36%) versus the alternative hypothesis (H1 : ORR=62%) at a type I error rate of 10% and 90% power. In the first stage, up to 13 patients could be accrued. If ≥6 responses occur, 16 additional patients will be accrued. The null hypothesis will be rejected if ≥14 responses are observed in these 29 patients. At the end of the first stage, an interim analysis was be performed to assess olaparib delivery during cycles 1 and 2 with the goal of 100% delivery in ≥ 80% of patients. We report the results of the primary endpoint and olaparib delivery for the first stage of the trial. Results: Twelve patients enrolled into the first stage of the trial. Key characteristics included median age 62 years (range 59-74), tobacco history (Y-5; N-7), primary site (oropharynx-7; oral cavity-4; larynx-1), HPV status (positive: 6; negative: 6) and PD-L1 status (CPS 0: 1; 1-19: 4; ≥20: 7). Tumor response occurred in 8 patients (ORR 67%). The best tumor response to date was CR (1), PR (7), SD (3) and PD (1). Olaparib delivery during cycles 1 and 2 was 100% for all patients. Conclusions: Among patients with RM-HNSCC, first-line treatment with olaparib, pembrolizumab and carboplatin resulted in an ORR of 67% during the first stage of the trial. Olaparib delivery was 100%. Enrollment into the second stage is ongoing. Clinical trial information: NCT04643379.

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2023 ASCO Annual Meeting

Session Type

Poster Discussion Session

Session Title

Head and Neck Cancer

Track

Head and Neck Cancer

Sub Track

Advanced/Metastatic Disease

Clinical Trial Registration Number

NCT04643379

Citation

J Clin Oncol 41, 2023 (suppl 16; abstr 6016)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2023.41.16_suppl.6016

Abstract #

6016

Poster Bd #

8

Abstract Disclosures