Efficacy by consolidation administration site: Subgroup analysis of a phase III study of CPX-351 versus 7+3 in older adults with newly diagnosed, high-risk acute myeloid leukemia (AML).

Authors

Jonathan Kolitz

Jonathan E. Kolitz

Hofstra Northwell School of Medicine, Hempstead, NY

Jonathan E. Kolitz , Stephen Anthony Strickland , Jorge E. Cortes , Donna Hogge , Jeffrey E. Lancet , Stuart L. Goldberg , Karen C Chung , Robert Ryan , Michael Chiarella , Arthur Chin Louie , Robert K. Stuart , Bruno C. Medeiros

Organizations

Hofstra Northwell School of Medicine, Hempstead, NY, Vanderbilt University Ingram Cancer Center, Nashville, TN, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Department of Leukemia, Houston, TX, Gordon and Leslie Diamond Health Care Centre, Vancouver, BC, Canada, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Canter and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, New York, NY, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Palo Alto, CA, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Philadelphia, PA, Celator Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Ewing, NJ, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, Stanford School of Medicine, Stanford, CA

Research Funding

Pharmaceutical/Biotech Company

Background: The CPX-351 liposomal formulation delivers a synergistic 5:1 molar ratio of cytarabine (C) and daunorubicin (D) preferentially to leukemia cells. CPX-351 has demonstrated significantly improved overall survival (OS) versus 7+3 in a randomized, open-label, phase III study in patients (pts) aged 60-75 years with newly diagnosed, high-risk AML. In contrast to 7+3, which includes C continuous infusion, CPX-351 is administered as a 90-minute infusion and has the potential to be given in the outpatient setting. The current analysis of the phase III trial assessed the setting of consolidation therapy. Methods: Pts were randomized 1:1 to 1-2 induction cycles of CPX-351 or 7+3; pts with complete remission (CR) or CR with incomplete platelet or neutrophil recovery (CRi) could receive up to 2 consolidation cycles (CPX-351: 65 u/m2 [C 65 mg/m2 + D 28.6 mg/m2] on Days 1 and 3; 7+3: C 100 mg/m2/day x 5 days + D 60 mg/m2 on Days 1 and 2). Site of administration was not protocol defined. Results: Few pts received induction as outpatient therapy (CPX-351 n = 3/153 and 7+3 n = 1/151 in each cycle). 49/153 CPX-351 pts and 32/151 7+3 pts received consolidation, with a substantial proportion of pts receiving CPX-351 as outpatients (consolidation 1: 51%; consolidation 2: 61%). CPX-351 consolidation was associated with substantial improvement in median OS versus 7+3 irrespective of inpatient/outpatient status (Table). Median OS was not diminished with CPX-351 administration in the outpatient versus inpatient setting (consolidation 1: 25.43 and 14.72, respectively; consolidation 2: 26.32 and not reached). Conclusions: Some pts can successfully receive CPX-351 consolidation as outpatients without diminished efficacy, potentially reducing hospitalizations associated with treatment administration. Clinical trial information: NCT01696084

Inpatient
Outpatient
CPX-3517+3CPX-3517+3
Consolidation 1, n/N (%)24/49 (49)30/32 (94)25/49 (51)2/32 (6)
Median OS, mo14.729.2625.436.87
HR (95% CI)0.55 (0.25, 1.21)0.10 (0.01, 1.11)
Consolidation 2, n/N (%)9/23 (39)12/12 (100)14/23 (61)0/12 (0)
Median OS, moNot reached14.3126.32
HR (95% CI)0.45 (0.09, 2.36)

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2017 ASCO Annual Meeting

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Hematologic Malignancies—Leukemia, Myelodysplastic Syndromes, and Allotransplant

Track

Hematologic Malignancies—Leukemia, Myelodysplastic Syndromes, and Allotransplant

Sub Track

Acute Leukemia

Clinical Trial Registration Number

NCT01696084

Citation

J Clin Oncol 35, 2017 (suppl; abstr 7036)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2017.35.15_suppl.7036

Abstract #

7036

Poster Bd #

236

Abstract Disclosures