John Theurer Cancer Center, Hackensack University Medical Center, Hackensack, NJ
David Siegel , Gary J. Schiller , Kevin W. Song , Richy Agajanian , Keith Stockerl-Goldstein , Hakan Kaya , Frederic J. Reu , Ehsan Malek , Giampaolo Talamo , Jorge L Mouro , Weiyuan Chung , Shankar Srinivasan , Max Qian , Syed Rizvi , Anjan Thakurta , Nizar J. Bahlis , Michael Sebag
Background: Recent trials of triple therapy in 2L and third-line (3L) Tx excluded pts refractory to LEN. This is not reflective of standard of care in first line and 2L where LEN is given until progressive disease (PD). MM-014 enrolled pts with RRMM and 2L LEN-based Tx failure. Here we report results only from cohort A of pts receiving POM + LoDEX. Cohort B will investigate POM + LoDEX + daratumumab. Methods: Adult pts with MM, 2 prior Tx lines, and PD after ≥ 2 cycles of 2L LEN-based Tx received POM + LoDEX. The primary endpoint was overall response rate (ORR). Other endpoints included time to response (TTR), PFS, second primary malignancies (SPMs), and biomarkers. Results: Of 51 pts in cohort A, 39 (76.5%) discontinued Tx. Most pts (88.2%) were refractory to their last LEN Tx, (median Tx duration 24.6 mos) and 72.5% had prior bortezomib. At a median follow-up of 13.6 mos, ORR was 29.4% (2.0% complete response, 9.8% very good partial response, and 17.6% partial response [PR]) and median TTR was 1.9 mos; 66% of pts had ongoing response at 1 yr. Minimal response [MR] was reached in 15.7%. Median PFS was 13.8 mos. Pts with ≥ MR had similar Tx durations as those achieving ≥ PR. Additional results in Table. Post-Tx T-cell populations were significantly higher vs baseline (CD3+, 72.6% vs 67.8%; CD3+/CD8+, 36.9% vs 32.1%). Relative changes from baseline were significantly greater in pts with response vs pts with no response (CD3+, 10.4 vs −0.8; CD3+/CD4+, 4.2 vs −3.5). Conclusions: This update confirms the safety and efficacy of POM + LoDEX following 2L LEN-based Tx failure in pts with RRMM. Hematologic adverse event (AE) rates improved and median PFS was longer with 3L use than previously reported with POM + LoDEX use in later Tx lines. In addition, achieving disease control of ≥ MR led to similar PFS rates as reaching ≥ PR. Clinical trial information: NCT01946477
Grade 3/4 AEs, % | N = 51 |
---|---|
Anemia | 25.5 |
Neutropenia | 11.8 |
Infections | 19.6 |
Pneumonia | 9.8 |
SPMs, % | 0 |
2-Yr PFS, % | |
Intent to treat | 48.6 |
≥ PR (n = 15) | 69.1a |
≥ MR (n = 23) | 69.4a |
POM Tx duration by response, mos | |
≥ PR (n = 15) | 11.5 |
≥ MR (n = 23) | 10.5 |
MR (n = 8) | 7.7 |
Stable disease (n = 21) | 3.7 |
a Subject to survival biases.
Disclaimer
This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org
Abstract Disclosures
2021 ASCO Annual Meeting
First Author: Xavier Leleu
2023 ASCO Annual Meeting
First Author: Cyrille Touzeau
2023 ASCO Annual Meeting
First Author: Cyrille Touzeau
2018 ASCO Annual Meeting
First Author: Paul G. Richardson