Pomalidomide (POM), bortezomib, and low‐dose dexamethasone (PVd) vs bortezomib and low-dose dexamethasone (Vd) in lenalidomide (LEN)-exposed patients (pts) with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM): Phase 3 OPTIMISMM trial.

Authors

null

Paul G. Richardson

Jerome Lipper Multiple Myeloma Center, Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA

Paul G. Richardson , Albert Oriol Rocafiguera , Meral Beksac , Anna Marina Liberati , Monica Galli , Fredrik Schjesvold , Jindriska Lindsay , Katja Weisel , Darell White , Thierry Facon , Jesus San-Miguel , Kazutaka Sunami , Peter O'Gorman , Pieter Sonneveld , Xin Yu , Thomas Doerr , Amine Bensmaine , Mohamed H. Zaki , Kenneth Carl Anderson , Meletios A. Dimopoulos

Organizations

Jerome Lipper Multiple Myeloma Center, Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, Institut Català d’Oncologia and Institut Josep Carreras, Hospital Germans Trias i Pujol, Barcelona, Spain, Ankara University, Cebeci Yerleskesi, Dikimevi, Ankara, Turkey, University of Perugia, Terni, Perugia, Italy, A.O. Ospedale Papa Giovanni XXIII, U.O. di Ematologia, Ospedali Riuniti di Bergamo, Bergamo, Italy, Oslo Universitetssykehus Rikshospitalet Postboks, Oslo, Norway, East Kent Hospitals University NHS Foundation Trust, Canterbury, United Kingdom, University of Tuebingen, Department of Hematology, Tuebingen, Germany, Queen Elizabeth II Health Sciences Centre, Halifax, NS, Canada, Hôpital Claude Huriez, Lille, France, Clínica Universidad de Navarra-CIMA, IDISNA, CIBERONC, Pamplona, Spain, National Hospital Organization Okayama Medical Center, Kitaku, Japan, Mater Misericordiae University Hospital, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, Netherlands, Celgene Corporation, Summit, NJ, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, School of Medicine, Athens, Greece

Research Funding

Pharmaceutical/Biotech Company

Background: POM, a standard-of-care treatment (Tx) in RRMM, has demonstrated synergistic anti-myeloma activity with dexamethasone (DEX) and proteasome inhibitors (PIs). POM + DEX is indicated for RRMM after ≥ 2 prior Txs including LEN and a PI, and is the only Tx to be investigated exclusively after LEN. As LEN becomes increasingly established in up-front Tx of MM, pts who have exhausted the benefit of LEN represent a clinically relevant unmet medical need. In preclinical studies, POM inhibited proliferation of LEN-resistant cells. Here we report final PFS and safety data from the first phase 3 POM triplet trial comparing PVd vs Vd in an entirely post-LEN treated population. Methods: Pts with RRMM, 1-3 prior Tx lines, and ≥ 2 cycles (c) of prior LEN were randomized 1:1 to receive PVd or Vd. In 21-d c, pts received POM 4 mg/d on d 1-14 (PVd arm only); BORT 1.3 mg/m² on d 1, 4, 8, and 11 of c 1-8 and on d 1 and 8 of c 9+; and DEX 20 mg/d (10 mg if aged > 75 yrs) on the days of and after BORT. The primary endpoint was PFS. Results: 559 pts were enrolled: 281 PVd and 278 Vd. Median age was 67 and 68 yrs, respectively. All pts had prior LEN (71% vs 69% LEN refractory), 72% vs 73% had prior BORT, and 70% vs 66% were refractory to last Tx. Median prior Tx lines was 2; 40% in PVd and 41% in Vd arm had 1 prior Tx line. After a median follow-up of 16 mos, PVd significantly reduced the risk of progression or death by 39% vs Vd (Table). OS data are not mature. Most common grade 3/4 treatment-emergent AEs were neutropenia (42% vs 9%), infections (31% vs 18%), and thrombocytopenia (27% vs 29%). Conclusions: To date, OPTIMISMM is the only phase 3 study in early RRMM to report a significant and clinically meaningful PFS improvement in pts who were entirely LEN exposed and 70% LEN refractory. Furthermore, the results showed improved benefit in pts with only 1 prior Tx line. POM safety remained manageable, consistent with its known profile. Clinical trial information: NCT01734928

Efficacy.

ITT
1 Prior Tx Line
PVd
n = 281
Vd
n = 278
PVd
n = 111
Vd
n = 115
PFS, mos
Median11.207.1020.7311.63
HR (95% CI)
P
0.61 (0.49-0.77)
< .0001
0.54 (0.36-0.82)
.0027
ORR (≥ PR), %82.250.090.154.8
≥ VGPR, %52.718.361.322.6

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2018 ASCO Annual Meeting

Session Type

Oral Abstract Session

Session Title

Hematologic Malignancies—Plasma Cell Dyscrasia

Track

Hematologic Malignancies—Plasma Cell Dyscrasia

Sub Track

Multiple Myeloma

Clinical Trial Registration Number

NCT01734928

Citation

J Clin Oncol 36, 2018 (suppl; abstr 8001)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2018.36.15_suppl.8001

Abstract #

8001

Abstract Disclosures