Jerome Lipper Multiple Myeloma Center, Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
Paul G. Richardson , Albert Oriol Rocafiguera , Meral Beksac , Anna Marina Liberati , Monica Galli , Fredrik Schjesvold , Jindriska Lindsay , Katja Weisel , Darell White , Thierry Facon , Jesus San-Miguel , Kazutaka Sunami , Peter O'Gorman , Pieter Sonneveld , Xin Yu , Thomas Doerr , Amine Bensmaine , Mohamed H. Zaki , Kenneth Carl Anderson , Meletios A. Dimopoulos
Background: POM, a standard-of-care treatment (Tx) in RRMM, has demonstrated synergistic anti-myeloma activity with dexamethasone (DEX) and proteasome inhibitors (PIs). POM + DEX is indicated for RRMM after ≥ 2 prior Txs including LEN and a PI, and is the only Tx to be investigated exclusively after LEN. As LEN becomes increasingly established in up-front Tx of MM, pts who have exhausted the benefit of LEN represent a clinically relevant unmet medical need. In preclinical studies, POM inhibited proliferation of LEN-resistant cells. Here we report final PFS and safety data from the first phase 3 POM triplet trial comparing PVd vs Vd in an entirely post-LEN treated population. Methods: Pts with RRMM, 1-3 prior Tx lines, and ≥ 2 cycles (c) of prior LEN were randomized 1:1 to receive PVd or Vd. In 21-d c, pts received POM 4 mg/d on d 1-14 (PVd arm only); BORT 1.3 mg/m² on d 1, 4, 8, and 11 of c 1-8 and on d 1 and 8 of c 9+; and DEX 20 mg/d (10 mg if aged > 75 yrs) on the days of and after BORT. The primary endpoint was PFS. Results: 559 pts were enrolled: 281 PVd and 278 Vd. Median age was 67 and 68 yrs, respectively. All pts had prior LEN (71% vs 69% LEN refractory), 72% vs 73% had prior BORT, and 70% vs 66% were refractory to last Tx. Median prior Tx lines was 2; 40% in PVd and 41% in Vd arm had 1 prior Tx line. After a median follow-up of 16 mos, PVd significantly reduced the risk of progression or death by 39% vs Vd (Table). OS data are not mature. Most common grade 3/4 treatment-emergent AEs were neutropenia (42% vs 9%), infections (31% vs 18%), and thrombocytopenia (27% vs 29%). Conclusions: To date, OPTIMISMM is the only phase 3 study in early RRMM to report a significant and clinically meaningful PFS improvement in pts who were entirely LEN exposed and 70% LEN refractory. Furthermore, the results showed improved benefit in pts with only 1 prior Tx line. POM safety remained manageable, consistent with its known profile. Clinical trial information: NCT01734928
ITT | 1 Prior Tx Line | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
PVd n = 281 | Vd n = 278 | PVd n = 111 | Vd n = 115 | |
PFS, mos | ||||
Median | 11.20 | 7.10 | 20.73 | 11.63 |
HR (95% CI) P | 0.61 (0.49-0.77) < .0001 | 0.54 (0.36-0.82) .0027 | ||
ORR (≥ PR), % | 82.2 | 50.0 | 90.1 | 54.8 |
≥ VGPR, % | 52.7 | 18.3 | 61.3 | 22.6 |
Disclaimer
This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org
Abstract Disclosures
2022 ASCO Annual Meeting
First Author: Andrew Spencer
2023 ASCO Annual Meeting
First Author: Darrell White
2023 ASCO Annual Meeting
First Author: Cyrille Touzeau
2020 ASCO Virtual Scientific Program
First Author: Fredrik Schjesvold