Phase 1 study of the p53-MDM2 inhibitor AMG 232 combined with trametinib plus dabrafenib or trametinib in patients (Pts) with TP53 wild type (TP53WT) metastatic cutaneous melanoma (MCM).

Authors

Stergios Moschos

Stergios J. Moschos

University of North Carolina Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill, NC

Stergios J. Moschos , Shahneen Kaur Sandhu , Karl D. Lewis , Ryan J. Sullivan , Douglas Buckner Johnson , Yilong Zhang , Erik Rasmussen , Haby A. Henary , Georgina V. Long

Organizations

University of North Carolina Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill, NC, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia, University of Colorado, Denver, CO, Developmental Therapeutics and Melanoma Programs, Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Boston, MA, Vanderbilt University Ingram Cancer Center, Nashville, TN, Amgen Inc., Thousand Oaks, CA, Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Royal North Shore and Mater Hospitals, Sydney, Australia

Research Funding

Pharmaceutical/Biotech Company

Background: Large sequencing studies in MCM have shown a TP53WT incidence of approximately 80%. In preclinical TP53WT melanoma models, the oral p53-MDM2 inhibitor AMG 232 exhibited synergistic, cytotoxic-type antitumor activity when combined with MAPK inhibitors. This phase 1 study assessed the toxicity (CTCAE 4.03), maximum tolerated dose (MTD), pharmacokinetics (PK), and preliminary antitumor activity (RECIST 1.1) of AMG 232 plus trametinib (T) and dabrafenib (D) (BRAFV600-mutant) or T (BRAFV600-WT) in pts with TP53WT MCM. Methods: Using 3+3 dose escalation design, pts with advanced TP53WT (using a CLIA-approved assay) MCM received AMG 232 PO QD for seven days of each 3-week cycle (7/21) at 120, 240, or 480 mg plus either T 2 mg PO QD and D 150 mg PO BID (Arm 1; BRAFV600-mutant) or T 2 mg QD (Arm 2; BRAFnonV600-mutant). Results: At the time of this analysis, 21 pts (median age, 58 y [range 24–76]; male, n = 11; at least 2 systemic treatments, n = 15) were treated. Arm 2 enrolled first: AMG 232 120 mg (n = 6), then 240 mg (n = 6). Due to chronic grade (G) 2 gastrointestinal toxicity, an intermediate dose (180 mg; n = 3) was determined as the preliminary MTD. Arm 1 enrolled at AMG 232 120 mg (n = 4), then 180 mg (n = 2). The most common reasons for AMG 232 withdrawal were disease progression (n = 8) and AEs (n = 4); 6 pts remain on AMG 232. All 21 pts had treatment-related AEs (TRAEs); the most common TRAEs were nausea (n = 18), fatigue (n = 17), diarrhea (n = 14), and vomiting (n = 13). The only DLT (Arm 2; 240 mg) was G 3 pulmonary embolism. Preliminary PK analysis suggests that AMG 232 exposure (area under the curve) is similar to that as monotherapy at the same dose, with no apparent drug-drug interaction between AMG 232 and T; analysis of D and T PK is ongoing. Of 21 pts, 6 had partial response (Arm 1/2, n = 4 [67%]/2 [13%]), 13 had stable disease (Arm 1/2, n = 2 [33%]/11 [73%]), and 2 progressed (Arm 1/2, n = 0/2 [13%]) as best response; 17 had tumor reduction (Arm 1/2, n = 6 [100%]/11 [73%]). Conclusions: In this population of pts with MCM, AMG 232 combined with D and/or T during DE was tolerable up to 180 mg QD 7/21 days, showing an acceptable PK profile and early antitumor activity. Clinical trial information: NCT02110355

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2017 ASCO Annual Meeting

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Developmental Therapeutics—Clinical Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics

Track

Developmental Therapeutics and Translational Research

Sub Track

Small Molecules

Clinical Trial Registration Number

NCT02110355

Citation

J Clin Oncol 35, 2017 (suppl; abstr 2575)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2017.35.15_suppl.2575

Abstract #

2575

Poster Bd #

67

Abstract Disclosures