Learning from near misses: Addressing nursing chemotherapy verification fatigue.

Authors

null

Meghan Shea

Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA

Meghan Shea, Aya Sato-DiLorenzo, Danielle Wright, Erika Coletti, Michael Carvalho, Jessica A. Zerillo

Organizations

Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA

Research Funding

Other

Background: Administration of chemotherapy is high-risk, requiring multiple safety checks, including pre-treatment laboratory value verification by nursing. A recent series of near misses in our event reporting system highlighted that nurses verified chemotherapy orders with pending pre-treatment or abnormal labs, such as grade 2 hyperbilirubinemia and grade 4 neutropenia. Such laboratory results would normally require holding or modifying planned treatment doses. Methods: Nurses treating patients in the outpatient chemotherapy infusion units were surveyed regarding barriers to pre-treatment lab verification. A team of clinicians, nurses, and pharmacists outlined a process map of the order verification process from acknowledging patient assignment and looking at patient oncologic history to sending the physician order to pharmacy. Pharmacists collected baseline data by tracking near-miss incidents. Results: The survey response rate of outpatient treatment nurses was 18 of 32 (56%). Nurses ranked inconsistent notation of treatment criteria in orders, long lab processing time, and patient frustration with a long wait as the most common barriers to lab verification. At baseline, in six non-consecutive weeks from August-October 2016, 31 of 947 (3%) orders were inappropriately verified by nursing in which pre-treatment lab results were pending or lab results did not meet parameters in the chemotherapy order. The team’s aim is by February 1, 2017, to reduce the number of chemotherapy orders sent to pharmacy without proper lab verification by 50%. Conclusions: Chemotherapy verification fatigue, specifically pre-treatment lab near misses, was identified as an area for improvement from recent patient safety reports. Barriers for nurses include inconsistent notation of treatment criteria in orders, long lab processing time, and patient frustration with a long wait. Interventions are underway to improve nursing adherence to pre-treatment lab verification.

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2017 ASCO Quality Care Symposium

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Poster Session A: Cost, Value, and Policy in Quality; Practice of Quality

Track

Cost, Value, and Policy in Quality,Practice of Quality

Sub Track

Learning from Projects Done in a Practice

Citation

J Clin Oncol 35, 2017 (suppl 8S; abstract 70)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2017.35.8_suppl.70

Abstract #

70

Poster Bd #

C11

Abstract Disclosures

Similar Abstracts

First Author: Luluh Bin Dayil

Abstract

2023 ASCO Quality Care Symposium

Improving timely initiation of oral chemotherapy in an outpatient malignant hematology practice.

First Author: Brittany Mejaki

First Author: Benjamin Edward Ueberroth