Exploring optimal sequence of abiraterone and enzalutamide in patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer: The Kyoto-Baltimore collaboration.

Authors

null

Naoki Terada

Department of Urology, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan

Naoki Terada , Benjamin Louis Maughan , Shusuke Akamatsu , Takashi Kobayashi , Toshinari Yamasaki , Takahiro Inoue , Tomomi Kamba , Osamu Ogawa , Emmanuel S. Antonarakis

Organizations

Department of Urology, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan, The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins, Baltimore, MD, Department of Urology, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, NY, Japan

Research Funding

Pharmaceutical/Biotech Company

Background: Abiraterone (ABI) and enzalutamide (ENZA) are novel hormonal treatments for castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) used before and after docetaxel (DTX) chemotherapy. We aimed to evaluate and compare the efficacy of sequential treatment with ABI followed by ENZA or vice versa in patients with CRPC, using combined data from two institutions. Methods: We retrospectively evaluated data on 352 consecutive patients who had received both ABI and ENZA for CRPC at Kyoto University Hospital and at Johns Hopkins Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center. Using Kaplan-Meier analysis and log-rank tests, we compared PSA progression-free survival (PSA-PFS) and overall survival (OS) in patients treated with sequential ABI-to-ENZA versus ENZA-to-ABI without intervening therapies. Results: The number of patients receiving ABI-to-ENZA and ENZA-to-ABI were 163 (pre-DTX: 116, post-DTX: 47) and 189 (pre-DTX: 85, post-DTX: 104), respectively. The > 50% PSA response rates to ABI and ENZA were 47% and 52% in the first-line CRPC setting, and were 9% and 29% in the second-line setting. In the pre-DTX population, median PSA-PFS was not significantly different between ABI (median: 194 days) and ENZA (median: 126 days) in the first-line setting (p = 0.411), but there was an advantage favoring ENZA (median: 91 days) compared to ABI (median: 55 days) in the second-line setting (p = 0.008). Furthermore, the combined PSA-PFS was significantly longer in the ABI-to-ENZA sequence (median: 455 days) than in the ENZA-to-ABI sequence (median: 296 days) (p < 0.001). There was no statistical difference in OS between the two sequences (p = 0.598). Conclusions: The ABI-to-ENZA sequence may have more favorable efficacy in terms of combined PSA-PFS than the ENZA-to-ABI sequence, although no differences in OS were observed. This may possibly be attributable to higher PSA response rates and longer PSA-PFS to second-line ENZA compared to ABI (i.e., ENZA retains activity after ABI but not vice versa).

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2017 Genitourinary Cancers Symposium

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Poster Session A: Prostate Cancer

Track

Prostate Cancer,Prostate Cancer

Sub Track

Prostate Cancer - Advanced Disease

Citation

J Clin Oncol 35, 2017 (suppl 6S; abstract 219)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2017.35.6_suppl.219

Abstract #

219

Poster Bd #

H21

Abstract Disclosures