Patient-provider communication during post-treatment breast cancer care: Findings from a pilot project.

Authors

null

Neetu Chawla

Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, CA

Neetu Chawla , Michael Sanchez , Jayson Harpster , Leslie Manace Brenman , Raymond Liu

Organizations

Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, CA, Kaiser Permanente, San Francisco, CA

Research Funding

Other

Background: Patient-provider communication is essential to delivering high quality cancer care, including post-treatment when survivors have many complex care needs. In this study, we used data collected for quality improvement from a small, feasibility sample to examine patient perceptions of provider communication and inform the development of a new Oncology Survivorship Clinic model. Methods: As part of a pilot project conducted at Kaiser Permanente Northern California (KPNC), we surveyed 51 breast cancer patients post-treatment. The survey included a communication measure from the 2011 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS) Experiences with Cancer survey evaluating provider discussions of: surveillance for recurrence; late or long-term treatment effects; healthy lifestyle behaviors; and emotional or social needs. We also examined reports of the six core functions of patient-centered communication (i.e. managing uncertainty, responding to emotions, making decisions, fostering healing relationships, enabling self-management, and exchanging information) using a measure from the Health Information Trends Survey (HINTS) survey. Part of the purpose was to evaluate acceptability of a new Oncology Survivorship Clinic utilizing non-physician providers. Results: The sample included 51 breast cancer patients surveyed in 2016 within six months of treatment completion. Overall, sizable proportions received detailed communication about surveillance (65%), treatment side effects (46%), emotional needs (41%), and healthy lifestyles (71%) and the majority received patient-centered communication (range: 60-73% based on core function). Particular gaps were noted related to provider communication about treatment side effects (54%), emotional/social needs (59%), managing uncertainty (35%), and responding to emotions (40%). Conclusions: Our very preliminary findings suggest that the majority of women had positive communication experiences, including with non-physician providers. However, clear communications gaps existed underscoring future avenues for research and care delivery interventions to address the comprehensive needs of breast cancer patients.

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2017 Cancer Survivorship Symposium

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Poster Session A: Care Coordination and Financial Implications, Communication, and Health Promotion

Track

Care Coordination and Financial Implications,Communication,Health Promotion

Sub Track

Communicating with Patients/Families/Caregivers

Citation

J Clin Oncol 35, 2017 (suppl 5S; abstr 91)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2017.35.5_suppl.91

Abstract #

91

Poster Bd #

J2

Abstract Disclosures

Similar Abstracts

Abstract

2023 ASCO Quality Care Symposium

Demand for oncology visits among low-risk breast cancer survivors.

First Author: Emily H. Douglas

Abstract

2019 ASCO Quality Care Symposium

Quality of care for cancer survivors: Does a model of shared care affect experience of care?

First Author: Michael T. Halpern

Abstract

2022 ASCO Quality Care Symposium

Oncologist-reported frequency of managing specific long-term and late effects in breast cancer survivors.

First Author: Eden Brauer

First Author: Renee Gilbert