Quality of care for cancer survivors: Does a model of shared care affect experience of care?

Authors

null

Michael T. Halpern

Temple University College of Public Health, Philadelphia, PA

Michael T. Halpern, Julia Cohen, Lisa M Lines, Michelle Mollica, Erin E Kent

Organizations

Temple University College of Public Health, Philadelphia, PA, RTI International, Waltham, MA, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD

Research Funding

U.S. National Institutes of Health
U.S. National Institutes of Health.

Background: Cancer survivors may have unique medical care needs due to chronic/late-occurring effects of cancer or cancer treatment. “Shared care,” survivorship care delivered by both oncologists and primary care providers (PCPs), may better address these needs. Little is known about outcomes for survivors receiving shared care vs. oncologist-led or PCP-led patterns of care. We compared patient reported experiences of care for survivors receiving oncologist-led, PCP-led, shared care, or other patterns of care. Methods: Analyses of SEER-CAHPS, a data resource linking NCI's Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) registry data, Medicare claims, and Medicare Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (CAHPS) survey responses. Individuals age ≥ 65 in SEER-CAHPS diagnosed 2000-2011 with breast, cervical, colorectal, lung, renal, or prostate cancer or hematologic malignancies who completed a Medicare CAHPS survey ≥ 18 months after diagnosis and were continuously enrolled in Medicare A & B ≥ 6 months before and 6 months after survey completion were included. CAHPS included ratings of Overall Care, Personal Doctor, Specialist Physician, Health Plan, and composite scores for Doctor Communication, Care Coordination, Getting Needed Care, Getting Care Quickly, and Getting Needed Drugs. Survivorship care patterns were identified using proportions of oncologist, PCP, and other physician encounters. Multivariable regressions examined associations between survivorship care patterns and CAHPS outcomes. Results: Among 10,132 survivors, 15% received Shared Care; 10% Oncologist-led; 33% PCP-led; and 42% Other. Compared with Shared Care, we found no significant differences in survivors' experience of care except for Getting Needed Drugs (lower for PCP-led and Other). Sensitivity analyses using different pattern of care definitions showed no associations between survivorship model and experience of care. Conclusions: Survivors’ experiences of care were similar for those in Shared Care vs. Oncologist-led, PCP-led, and Other patterns of care. Within the study’s limitations, these results do not indicate enhanced patient reported medical care experiences for survivors receiving shared care.

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2019 ASCO Quality Care Symposium

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Poster Session B: Patient Experience; Safety; Technology and Innovation in Quality of Care

Track

Patient Experience,Technology and Innovation in Quality of Care,Safety

Sub Track

Provider Impact on Quality From the Patient Perspective

Citation

J Clin Oncol 37, 2019 (suppl 27; abstr 213)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2019.37.27_suppl.213

Abstract #

213

Poster Bd #

D12

Abstract Disclosures

Similar Abstracts

Abstract

2022 ASCO Quality Care Symposium

Shift in survivorship care delivery.

First Author: Elizabeth Boutin McGrath

First Author: Hira Latif

First Author: Belle Hadewijch de Rooij

First Author: Michelle Payan