The clinical significance of KRAS monitoring in tumor tissues and blood of patients with pancreatic tumor.

Authors

null

Fumiaki Watanabe

Department of Surgery, Saitama Medical Center, Jichi Medical University, Saitama, Japan

Fumiaki Watanabe , Koichi Suzuki , Kosuke Ichida , Yuji Takayama , Taro Fukui , Nao Kakizawa , Hiroshi Noda , Toshiki Rikiyama

Organizations

Department of Surgery, Saitama Medical Center, Jichi Medical University, Saitama, Japan

Research Funding

Other Foundation

Background: Monitoring of gene alterations in blood to track circulating tumor DNAs has been attempted for a clinical application. For example, KRAS monitoring in colorectal cancer provides a valuable biomarker for diagnosis and prediction of treatment outcome. While half of of colon cancer has RAS mutation, 90% of pancreatic cancer shows KRAS mutation, suggesting that most of pancreatic cancer is a good candidate for KRAS monitoring. In this study, we elucidated the clinical significance of KRASmonitoring in patients with pancreatic tumor during treatments. Methods:KRAS mutation in tumor tissues was determined by Scorpion ARMS or RASKET methods in 39 patients with pancreatic tumors. KRASmutation in blood (G12D, G12V, G12C, G12A, G12S, G12R, G13D, Q61L, Q61H) were investigated by using droplet digital polymerase chain reaction (ddPCR) in 24 patients treated with chemotherapy. Results:KRAS assessment in tumor tissues showed 33 patients with mutation and 6 patients without mutation. Thirty-three patients with mutation showed significantly poor prognosis of 49% in three years overall survival (OS) as compared with 100% in 6 patients with mutation (p=0.02). KRAS assessment in blood revealed that KRAS mutation was detected in 14 patients, but no detection was seen in 10 patients. Patients harboring KRAS mutation in blood exhibited significantly poor treatment outcome, including 12 patients with progressive disease, as compared with 10 patients without detection of mutation, including 6 patients with any treatment responses (stable disease in 4 patients and partial response in 2 patients, p=0.03). Fourteen patients with mutation in blood displayed poor prognosis of 20% in three years overall survival (OS), comparing to 69% in 10 patients without mutation in blood (p=0.06). Conclusions:KRAS status in tumor tissues was involved in prognosis; in addition, KRAS status in blood was implicated in treatment response of chemotherapy in patients with pancreatic tumor. KRAS monitoring in tumor tissues and blood provides useful information for the treatment strategy including chemotherapy in patients with pancreatic tumor.

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2017 Gastrointestinal Cancers Symposium

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Poster Session B: Cancers of the Pancreas, Small Bowel and Hepatobiliary Tract

Track

Cancers of the Pancreas, Small Bowel, and Hepatobiliary Tract

Sub Track

Translational Research

Citation

J Clin Oncol 35, 2017 (suppl 4S; abstract 334)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2017.35.4_suppl.334

Abstract #

334

Poster Bd #

F4

Abstract Disclosures

Similar Abstracts

Abstract

2022 ASCO Gastrointestinal Cancers Symposium

KRAS mutation methylation clonality in early-stage pancreatic cancer.

First Author: Jeanne Kowalski

Abstract

2023 ASCO Annual Meeting

Relations between mutant KRAS and TP53 subtypes and other co-mutations in pancreatic cancer.

First Author: Soniya Abraham