Pilot study of incorporating a supportive care program into a small community oncology practice.

Authors

null

Karly Kalstrom

Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ

Karly Kalstrom, Kelly Schultz, Jennifer Thompson, Michael Thomas Byrne, Andrew J. Buresh, Brendan F. Curley

Organizations

Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, Sage Hospice, Scottsdale, AZ, Arizona Center for Cancer Care, Scottsdale, AZ, Division of Hematology and Medical Oncology and Vanderbilt-Ingram Comprehensive Cancer Center, Nashville, TN, Desert Springs Cancer Care, Scottsdale, AZ

Research Funding

Other

Background: Incorporation of supportive care has become standard of care in patients with advanced or metastatic cancer undergoing palliative chemotherapy. Implementation of a supportive care program is often difficult in a small community practice due to a multitude of factors. Methods: We piloted a supportive care program with the partnership of Sage Hospice & Palliative Care in which patients with advanced or metastatic cancer undergoing chemotherapy would be evaluated by a certified nurse practitioner (CNP). Patients were selected for evaluation based on age, stage of cancer, and likelihood of needing additional supportive measures during their oncologic treatment. Patients were enrolled in the program by seeing the CNP and being followed throughout their chemotherapy, or until their death. Home visits were done by the CNP after hours, on weekends, or during business hours if it was noted to be medically necessary. Results: Forty-four patients were enrolled in the supportive care program. All patients either had metastatic or advanced cancer that required chemotherapy. The most common diagnoses are breast, pancreatic, prostate and lung cancer. The average number of patient home visits was 3.35 visits. Interventions varied, but the most common tasks performed were IV hydration, pain control and symptom management. Of the 44 patients, only 7 required an inpatient stay (15.9%) and none of these patients required a second hospital stay or were noted to be a 30 day readmission. Ten patients were enrolled in hospice, and 7 of those patients died. Zero patients died while on treatment or died without being enrolled on hospice. Conclusions: Incorporation of a supportive care program is feasible in a small community practice. The benefits may include improved patient outcomes, decreased hospitalizations, and smoother transition to end of life care.

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2016 Palliative and Supportive Care in Oncology Symposium

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Poster Session A

Track

Evaluation and Assessment of Patient Symptoms and Quality of Life,Integration and Delivery of Palliative Care in Cancer Care

Sub Track

Models of care delivery

Citation

J Clin Oncol 34, 2016 (suppl 26S; abstr 149)

DOI

10.1200/jco.2016.34.26_suppl.149

Abstract #

149

Poster Bd #

H3

Abstract Disclosures